Precision adjuvant therapy after nephrectomy for high-risk clear-cell renal cell carcinoma: a narrative review | Parras | Uro-Technology Journal

Precision adjuvant therapy after nephrectomy for high-risk clear-cell renal cell carcinoma: a narrative review

Patricia Rodríguez Parras, Alberto Zambudio Munuera, Irene Millán Ramos, Ana Morales Martínez, Francisco Gutiérrez Tejero, Miguel Ángel Arrabal Polo

Abstract


Adjuvant therapy for renal cell carcinoma has moved from repeated negative trials to an evolving postopera-tive treatment landscape. Pembrolizumab is the first systemic therapy after nephrectomy to demonstrate both disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) benefit in patients with clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) at increased risk of recurrence. However, clinicopathological eligibility exposes some patients already cured by surgery to immune-related toxicity and cannot identify microscopic residual disease. This narrative review integrates mature KEYNOTE-564 outcomes, the active-control LITESPARK-022 trial of pembrolizumab plus belzutifan, RAMPART findings, prior negative immune-checkpoint inhibitor and tyrosine-kinase inhibi-tor trials, and emerging biomarkers. We explicitly distinguish established standard care, promising but not yet mature strategies, and interventions that remain investigational. One year of pembrolizumab is the estab-lished evidence-based option for medically suitable KEYNOTE-564-eligible patients. Pembrolizumab plus bel-zutifan improves DFS versus pembrolizumab alone and is approved in the United States, but OS is immature, toxicity is greater, and its place in other regions remains unsettled. Dual-checkpoint blockade, postoperative treatment allocation based on kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1) or circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), molecular subtypes, programmed death-ligand 1 expression, and radiomics remain investigational. No biomarker is vali-dated to select routine adjuvant therapy, and efficacy in non-clear-cell histologies has not been established. We propose a conceptual three-axis framework integrating clinicopathological recurrence risk, candidate residu-al-disease signals, and treatment fitness or patient preference. It is a decision aid, not a validated algorithm. At present, precision resides mainly in risk stratification, fitness assessment, and shared decision-making; mo-lecular treatment selection awaits prospective validation.

Keywords: Renal cell carcinoma, precision oncology, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, biomarkers




Subscribe to receive issue release notifications
and newsletters from journals