Open Access | LETTER
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Non-drug therapy for sleep disorders in the elderly: a focus on neurofeedback technology
* Corresponding author: Igor Shirolapov
Mailing address: Research Institute of Neurosciences, Head of laboratory, Samara State Medical University, 443099, Russia.
Email: ishirolapov@mail.ru
Received: 17 November 2025 / Revised: 05 December 2025 / Accepted: 08 December 2025 / Published: 31 March 2026
DOI: 10.31491/APT.2025.12.192
Clinical efficacy, advantages and prospects for the elderly
Sleep disorders, particularly insomnia, represent a significant and growing challenge in geriatric medicine, with
prevalence notably increasing with age, affecting a substantial portion of the elderly population. In older adults,
insomnia often manifests as fragmented sleep, early
morning awakenings, and reduced sleep efficiency. This
condition is not merely a nocturnal inconvenience but a
serious health concern that exacerbates age-associated
decline, contributing to cognitive impairment, metabolic
and cardiovascular diseases, and compromised immune
function [1-3]. The therapeutic landscape for insomnia in
this demographic is fraught with challenges. While pharmacotherapy offers short-term relief, it carries significant risks of side effects, dependence, and dangerous interactions in the context of polypharmacy, which is common
among older adults [4]. Although cognitive-behavioral
therapy for insomnia is considered the gold standard, its
widespread adoption is hindered by significant time and
financial costs, creating substantial accessibility barriers
for many elderly individuals [5, 6].
In this context, EEG neurofeedback (NF) has emerged
as a compelling non-pharmacological alternative, with a
growing evidence base substantiated by numerous clinical
studies, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. This technology is grounded in the principles of operant conditioning, enabling patients to learn self-regulation of their brain
activity through real-time feedback. The relevance of this
approach for the aging brain is particularly pronounced.
Key NF protocols that have been rigorously investigated
target the sensorimotor rhythm (SMR, 12-15 Hz) and,
most notably, the individual alpha peak frequency (iAPF)
[7-10]. The iAPF serves as a key biomarker of the dynamic balance between cortical activation and relaxation.
A robust body of research indicates that in patients with
insomnia, the iAPF is often shifted towards lower frequencies, reflecting a persistent state of heightened cortical activation that disrupts the natural process of falling
asleep. This specific neurophysiological dysregulation is frequently observed and can be exacerbated in aging,
thereby positioning iAPF-based NF as a mechanistically
targeted intervention for geriatric chronic insomnia.
The efficacy of NF is not merely theoretical but is confirmed by a synthesis of empirical data from multiple
clinical trials. Analysis of contemporary studies demonstrates consistent and significant improvements in sleep
parameters relevant to older adults. Subjective measures,
most commonly the pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI),
show substantial score reductions of 25-45%, indicating
a markedly improved perception of sleep quality. These
subjective reports are robustly supported by objective
measurements obtained through polysomnography and
actigraphy, which demonstrate a 20-40% decrease in sleep
onset latency and a clinically meaningful increase of 15-
40 minutes in total sleep time. For elderly patients, who
typically suffer from prolonged sleep initiation and fragmented sleep architecture, these gains represent a substantial enhancement in quality of life [10-13]. The underlying
mechanism is intrinsically linked to the core objective of
NF training: training in self-regulation, control of biological rhythms of brain activity, the stabilization of the iAPF
and a concomitant reduction in pathological theta and
high-beta oscillatory power, which indicates a successful
down-regulation of pre-sleep hyperarousal at a neurophysiological level [14-16].
The advantages of NF, as highlighted across various reviews and original studies, make it exceptionally suitable
for the nuances of geriatric care. Its fundamental noninvasiveness and absence of drug-related side effects are
paramount for older adults who are highly susceptible
to adverse drug reactions. The personalized approach,
guided by the individual’s unique iAPF biomarker, allows
for precise tailoring of therapy to address the heterogeneous nature of age-related sleep changes and comorbidities [16-19]. Furthermore, the potential for application in
outpatient or even home settings significantly enhances
feasibility and accessibility for patients with mobility
limitations or those residing in remote areas. For example,
a systematic review by Recio-Rodriguez et al. consolidates findings from multiple randomized trials, reinforcing the conclusion that NF is a validated intervention for
enhancing sleep quality [16]. Beyond its primary effect on
sleep, NF demonstrates a valuable potential for alleviating
comorbid symptoms of anxiety and depression, which are
highly prevalent in the elderly and further degrade overall
quality of life and functional independence.
Despite the promising and consolidating evidence, the
field acknowledges certain limitations in the current research landscape, including small sample sizes in some
pioneering studies and a relative lack of long-term followup data specifically for aging cohorts. The heterogeneity
in NF protocols across studies, while reflecting a dynamic
field of inquiry, complicates direct comparison and underscores the need for standardization. Future research
directions, as outlined in consensus statements and review
articles, must involve large-scale, multicenter studies
specifically powered to include and analyze older adult
subgroups. This will be crucial for establishing optimized, age-adapted protocols. Parallel technological development
should focus on creating intuitive and senior-friendly
systems to ensure high adoption rates among the geriatric
demographic. A critical and promising avenue for future
investigation involves a deeper exploration of how NF
modulates age-specific physiological pathways, particularly those linking sleep disruption, impaired glymphatic
clearance, and the progression of neurodegeneration and
inflammaging [20-24].
In conclusion, EEG-neurofeedback represents a safe, effective, and personalized tool for managing insomnia in
the elderly, with its efficacy supported by a converging
body of evidence from clinical trials and systematic reviews. By directly targeting the core neurophysiological
disturbances of sleep in the aging brain, it offers a viable
and compelling strategy to improve sleep quality and,
consequently, overall health and well-being in the growing elderly population. With continued technological
refinement, standardized research, and dedicated clinical
validation, NF technology is poised to become an integral
component of geriatric sleep medicine and a cornerstone
of age-adapted personalized healthcare.
Declarations
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
Financial support and sponsorship
None.
Conflicts of interest
Not applicable.
Ethical approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
References
1. Van Someren E. Brain mechanisms of insomnia: new perspectives on causes and consequences. Physiol Rev, 2021, 101(3): 995-1046. [Crossref]
2. Krueger J. Sleep and circadian rhythms: evolutionary entanglement and local regulation. Neurobiology of Sleep and Circadian Rhythms, 2020, 9: 100052. [Crossref]
3. Shirolapov I, Zakharov A, Smirnova D, Khivintseva E, & Sergeeva M. Aging brain, dementia and impaired glymphatic pathway: causal relationships. Psychiatr Danub, 2023, 35(Suppl 2): 236-244.
4. Angelillo M, Lancee J, & Hertenstein E. Novel psychotherapies for insomnia. J Sleep Res, 2025, 34(5): e14470. [Crossref]
5. Walker J, Muench A, Perlis M, & Vargas I. Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I): a primer. Klin Spec Psihol, 2022, 11(2): 123-137. [Crossref]
6. Kremer S, & Blue T. Biofeedback as an adjunct or alternative intervention to cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia. Sleep Med Clin, 2023, 18(1): 85-93. [Crossref]
7. Ros T, B J, Lanius R, & Vuilleumier P. Tuning pathological brain oscillations with neurofeedback: a systems neuroscience framework. Front Hum Neurosci, 2014, 8: 1008. [Crossref]
8. Klimesch W. The frequency architecture of brain and brain body oscillations: an analysis. Eur J Neurosci, 2018, 48(7): 2431-2453. [Crossref]
9. Bazanova O, Balioz N, Ermolaeva S, Zakharov A, Zonov A, Larkova I, et al. Study of psychophysiological indicators of sensorimotor integration in PTSD. Justification of the choice of targets for biofeedback. Human Physiology, 2024, 50(3): 249-259. [Crossref]
10. Lee E, Hong J, Choi H, & Yoon I. Modest effects of neurofeedback-assisted meditation using a wearable device on stress reduction: a randomized, double-blind, and controlled study. J Korean Med Sci, 2024, 39(9): e94. [Crossref]
11. Wang H, Hou Y, Zhan S, Li N, Liu J, Song P, et al. EEG biofeedback decreases theta and beta power while increasing alpha power in insomniacs: an open-label study. Brain Sci, 2023, 13(11): 1542-1555. [Crossref]
12. Min B, Park H, Kim J, Lee S, Back S, Lee E, et al. The effectiveness of a neurofeedback-assisted mindfulness training program using a mobile app on stress reduction in employees: randomized controlled trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth, 2023, 11: e42851. [Crossref]
13. Krepel N, Egtberts T, Touré-Cuq E, Bouny P, & Arns M. Evaluation of the URGOnight Tele-neurofeedback device: an open-label feasibility study with follow-up. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback, 2022, 47(1): 43-51. [Crossref]
14. Shirolapov I, Zakharov A, Smirnova D, Lyamin A, & Gayduk A. The significance of the glymphatic pathway in the relationship between the sleep-wake cycle and neurodegenerative diseases. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova, 2023, 123(9): 31-36. [Crossref]
15. Benatti B, Girone N, Conti D, Celebre L, Macellaro M, Molteni L, et al. Intensive neurofeedback protocol: an alpha training to improve sleep quality and stress modulation in health care professionals during the covid-19 pandemic. A pilot study. Clin Neuropsychiatry, 2023, 20(1): 61-66. [Crossref]
16. Recio-Rodriguez J, Fernandez-Crespo M, Sanchez-Aguadero N, Gonzalez-Sanchez J, Garcia-Yu I, Alonso-Dominguez R, et al. Neurofeedback to enhance sleep quality and insomnia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Front Neurosci, 2024, 18: 1450163. [Crossref]
17. Shirolapov I, Zakharov A, Smirnova D, Lyamin A, & Gayduk A. The role of the glymphatic clearance system in the mechanisms of the interactions of the sleep–waking cycle and the development of neurodegenerative processes. Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology, 2024, 54(2): 199-204. [Crossref]
18. Lin Y, Hsu T, Hsu C, Chen P, Tseng P, & Liang C. Effectiveness of electroencephalography neurofeedback for improving working memory and episodic memory in the elderly: a meta-analysis. Medicina, 2024, 60(3): 369-384. [Crossref]
19. Bulgakova S, Kurmaev D, Treneva E, Shirolapov I, & Bulgakov A. Influence of nutrition and epigenetics on the development of neurodegenerative diseases in elderly and old people. Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology, 2024, (8): 89-95. [Crossref]
20. Tosti B, Corrado S, Mancone S, Di Libero T, Rodio A, Andrade A, et al. Integrated use of biofeedback and neurofeedback techniques in treating pathological conditions and improving performance: a narrative review. Front Neurosci, 2024, 18: 1358481. [Crossref]
21. Zakharov A, & Shirolapov I. The potential of neurofeedback control in treating insomnia and improving sleep quality (a systematic review). Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova, 2025, 125(5. Vyp. 2): 57-63. [Crossref]
22. Chan N, Chan J, Li S, & Wing Y. Non-pharmacological approaches for management of insomnia. Neurotherapeutics, 2021, 18(1): 32-43. [Crossref]
23. Shirolapov I, Zakharov A, Bulgakova S, Khivintseva E, Sergeeva M, Romanchuk N, et al. Glymphatic dysfunction in the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases and pathological aging. Genes and Cells, 2023, 18(4): 309-322. [Crossref]
24. Ribeiro T, Carriello M, de Paula E, Jr., Garcia A, da Rocha G, & Teive H. Clinical applications of neurofeedback based on sensorimotor rhythm: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Neurosci, 2023, 17: 1195066. [Crossref]