Open Access | Review
      This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. 
Proteostasis in aging: mechanistic insights and therapeutic opportunities
      
      * Corresponding author: Gaurav N. Kasar
      Mailing address: Department of Pharmacology, Divine College of Pharmacy, Satana (Nashik), India.
      Email: gauravkasar008@gmail.com
    
Received: 17 December 2024 / Revised: 06 January 2024 / Accepted: 10 January 2025 / Published: 28 March 2025
DOI: 10.31491/APT.2025.03.165
Abstract
Proteostasis, the dynamic balance of protein synthesis, folding, and degradation, is fundamental to cellular homeostasis and organismal health. Aging disrupts proteostasis networks, leading to the accumulation of misfolded and aggregated proteins, which plays a central role in age-related dysfunction and the onset of diseases such as neurodegenerative and metabolic disorders. This review comprehensively explores the components and regulatory mechanisms of proteostasis networks, including key proteolytic systems like the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) and autophagy, as well as the role of molecular chaperones in maintaining protein folding. We discuss hallmark features of aging-related proteostasis dysfunction and highlight its implications in major age-associated diseases, particularly neurodegenerative conditions like Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s, and metabolic disorders such as diabetes and obesity. Additionally, emerging therapeutic strategies aimed at restoring proteostasis for healthy aging are examined, focusing on targeting chaperones, enhancing proteolytic systems, and modulating protein folding pathways. Advances in transcription factor regulation, proteasome activators, and autophagy modulators, as well as promising approaches involving small molecules and gene therapy, are discussed. Finally, we outline future directions and conclude that targeting proteostasis represents a promising avenue for improving health span and mitigating age-related diseases.
Keywords
Proteostasis, proteolytic, dysfunction, neurodegenerative, age-related diseases
Introduction
Proteostasis, or protein homeostasis, 
          is a critical process involving the synthesis, 
          folding, trafficking, and degradation of proteins 
          to maintain a functional proteome. It plays an 
          essential role in cellular health by ensuring 
          proteins achieve and retain their proper 
          three-dimensional structure, which is necessary
          for their biological function [1]. The proteostasis
          network includes molecular chaperones that assist
          in protein folding, the ubiquitin-proteasome
          system for protein degradation, and pathways
          that address protein misfolding and aggregation.
          These systems work in concert to manage protein
          quality and prevent the accumulation of defective
          proteins, which can disrupt cellular functions
          and lead to diseases, particularly neurodegenerative
          conditions like Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s [2, 3]. 
          The efficiency of the proteostasis machinery is 
          challenged by factors such as aging, environmental 
          stress, and disease. As organisms age, the decline 
          in proteostasis capacity contributes to the accumulation 
          of misfolded or aggregated proteins, which are hallmarks 
          of several age-related disorders. For example, molecular 
          chaperones and proteasomal activity decline with age, 
          making cells less capable of managing protein quality. 
          Understanding the mechanisms of proteostasis and its 
          regulation not only provides insights into fundamental 
          biology but also has therapeutic implications for 
          improving health and treating diseases associated 
          with proteome instability [4-6].
          
          As organisms age, the mechanisms 
          that regulate proteostasis protein 
          synthesis, folding, and degradation 
          become less effective, leading to an 
          accumulation of misfolded and damaged 
          proteins. This imbalance, often termed 
          "proteostasis collapse", significantly 
          impacts cellular function, longevity, 
          and susceptibility to diseases such as 
          neurodegeneration, cancer, and cardiovascular 
          disorders. Proteostasis is maintained by an 
          intricate network of molecular chaperones, 
          the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS), and 
          autophagy pathways. With aging, these systems 
          face increased oxidative stress, damage from 
          reactive oxygen species (ROS), and a decline 
          in efficiency [7]. The UPS, critical for degrading 
          short-lived or misfolded proteins, becomes impaired, 
          leading to an accumulation of ubiquitinated proteins 
          and aggregates that disrupt cellular homeostasis. 
          Similarly, autophagy, which removes large protein 
          aggregates and damaged organelles, declines with age, 
          further exacerbating proteotoxic stress. These deficiencies 
          contribute to the hallmark signs of aging, such as cellular 
          senescence, chronic inflammation, and tissue dysfunction. 
          The decline in proteostasis significantly contributes to 
          cellular aging and chronic diseases. For instance, in 
          neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s, 
          protein aggregates such as amyloid-beta and alpha-synuclein 
          disrupt cellular function. In cancer, although proteostasis 
          mechanisms are hyper activated to support the rapid proliferation 
          of cells, aging reduces their efficacy, potentially leading to 
          tumorigenesis. Moreover, systemic inflammation associated with 
          aging, termed "inflammation," is partially driven by the phototoxic 
          stress caused by impaired protein homeostasis. Interventions targeting 
          these pathways, such as enhancing autophagy or proteasomal activity, 
          have shown potential in extending lifespan and improving health span 
          in model organisms [8, 9].
          
          The primary objective of this review is to explore 
          the intricate relationship between proteostasis 
          and aging, emphasizing how the regulation of protein 
          homeostasis impacts cellular health and overall longevity. 
          It aims to examine the role of proteostasis in maintaining 
          protein quality and stability and its deterioration 
          as a hallmark of aging. Furthermore, the review 
          investigates the implications of disrupted 
          proteostasis for human health, with a focus 
          on age-related diseases such as neurodegeneration, 
          cancer, and cardiovascular disorders. By understanding 
          the mechanisms underlying proteostasis collapse and its 
          association with aging, the review seeks to highlight 
          potential therapeutic strategies to enhance proteostasis, 
          promote healthy aging, and mitigate the progression of 
          age-related diseases.
        
Proteostasis networks: components and mechanisms
Molecular chaperones play an essential role in protein folding and quality control by assisting in the proper folding of newly synthesized proteins, ensuring their stability, and preventing the aggregation of misfolded proteins [3]. These chaperones act in several ways, such as by binding to nascent proteins and preventing their premature folding or degradation, or by facilitating the refolding of misfolded proteins under stress conditions like heat or oxidative stress. They help maintain proteostasis, which is crucial for cellular function, particularly in cells subjected to environmental stressors, such as neurons. Heat shock proteins (HSPs) are among the most well-known molecular chaperones, and they are named for their increased expression in response to heat stress. HSPs, including Hsp70, Hsp90, and small HSPs, provide a protective environment that allows proteins to adopt their functional conformations. When refolding is impossible, chaperones direct misfolded proteins to degradation pathways, such as the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) or autophagy, preventing the accumulation of toxic aggregates that can impair cellular function [10, 11] . Chaperones are involved in a range of protein quality control mechanisms, such as disaggregating protein clusters or guiding defective proteins to degradation pathways. For example, misfolded proteins are often marked by ubiquitination, which signals the proteasome to degrade them, while other misfolded proteins are transported to lysosomes for breakdown through autophagy. This intricate system is particularly vital for preventing neurodegenerative diseases associated with protein misfolding, such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases [12] (Table 1).
Table 1.
              Various examples of Chaperone involved in protein folding and quality control.
| Chaperone | Role | Function/Mechanism | References | 
|---|---|---|---|
| HSP70 | Protein folding, refolding, stabilization | HSP70 binds to nascent polypeptides, preventing premature folding and aggregation, and refolds misfolded proteins. | [3, 10] | 
| HSP90 | Protein maturation, stability | HSP90 assists in the maturation of client proteins, including kinases, and stabilizes misfolded proteins. | [11, 12] | 
| sHSPs (small heat shock proteins) | Prevent aggregation, assist in protein folding | sHSPs prevent aggregation by binding to unfolded proteins under stress and facilitate their refolding. | [10, 12] | 
| HSP60 (GroEL) | Protein folding and assembly | HSP60 acts as a molecular chaperonin, forming a chamber where proteins are enclosed and properly folded. | [13, 14] | 
| HSP100 | Protein disaggregation, proteostasis | HSP100 proteins assist in the disaggregation of protein complexes and refold proteins under stress conditions. | [15] | 
| TriC/CCT | Protein folding, oligomeric assembly | TriC/CCT is a chaperonin complex that assists in the folding of actin, tubulin, and other cytoskeletal proteins. | [16, 17] | 
| HSP40 | Co-chaperone, assists HSP70 | HSP40 interacts with HSP70, guiding substrate proteins to HSP70 for folding and preventing aggregation. | [18, 19] | 
Proteolytic systems
Ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS)
The UPS is an essential intracellular proteolytic pathway that plays a central role in maintaining proteostasis the delicate balance of protein synthesis, folding, and degradation within cells. The UPS ensures the selective degradation of damaged, misfolded, or unnecessary proteins, preventing the accumulation of toxic aggregates that can disrupt cellular function. The system operates through a tightly regulated sequence of events. It begins with the activation of ubiquitin, a small regulatory protein, by the E1 ubiquitin-activating enzyme in an ATP-dependent manner. This activated ubiquitin is transferred to the E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme, and finally, the E3 ubiquitin ligase facilitates the attachment of ubiquitin to specific substrate proteins, determining their fate (Figure 1). Proteins tagged with polyubiquitin chains are subsequently recognized and degraded by the 26S proteasome, a highly specialized protease complex. The degradation process releases peptides, which are further broken down into amino acids for recycling.

Figure 1. Ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS).
 
    E1 (ubiquitin-activating enzyme): E1 
    is the initial enzyme in the ubiquitination cascade. 
    It activates ubiquitin in an ATP-dependent manner, 
    forming a high-energy thioester bond between the 
    C-terminal glycine residue of ubiquitin and a cysteine 
    residue on the E1 enzyme. This step primes ubiquitin 
    for subsequent transfer and is critical for initiating 
    the ubiquitination process. E1 exists in limited numbers 
    in cells, as a single E1 enzyme can activate multiple 
    ubiquitin molecules for further transfer to E2 enzymes. 
    The activation involves two steps: Adenylation of the 
    ubiquitin molecule’s C-terminal glycine using ATP, producing 
    ubiquitin-AMP and Formation of the thioester bond between 
    ubiquitin and the active site cysteine of E1, releasing AMP [20].
    
    E2 (ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme): The E2 enzyme 
    receives ubiquitin from E1 through a transthiolation 
    reaction, where the activated ubiquitin is transferred 
    to an active site cysteine on E2. E2 enzymes are responsible 
    for carrying ubiquitin to E3 ligases and determining the 
    type of ubiquitin chain linkage that will be added to the 
    substrate. E2 enzymes also dictate the topology of the 
    ubiquitin chain, influencing the fate of the ubiquitinated 
    protein.  There are multiple E2 enzymes in cells, each 
    specialized for different functions, such as monoubiquitination, 
    polyubiquitination, or specific chain formations like K48-linked 
    chains (for degradation) or K63-linked chains (for signaling) [21, 22]. 
    
    E3 (ubiquitin ligase): E3 ligases are responsible 
    for the substrate specificity of ubiquitination. 
    These enzymes recognize target proteins through 
    specific degradation signals or motifs, such as 
    phosphorylation tags or hydrophobic patches 
    exposed due to protein misfolding. E3 ligases 
    catalyze the transfer of ubiquitin from the E2 
    enzyme to the target protein, either directly 
    or indirectly. Types of E3 ligases: HECT (homologous 
    to E6-AP carboxyl terminus): These E3 ligases form 
    a thioester intermediate with ubiquitin before 
    transferring it to the substrate. RING (really 
    interesting new gene) and RBR (RING-between-RING): 
    These E3s facilitate the direct transfer of ubiquitin 
    from E2 to the substrate without forming a thioester 
    bond. The substrate recognition of E3 ligases is 
    critical for cellular regulation, as it ensures that 
    only proteins marked for degradation are ubiquitinated. 
    Examples include the MDM2 ligase, which targets p53, 
    and Parkin, associated with mitochondrial quality control. 
    The coordinated action of E1, E2, and E3 enzymes ensures 
    the selectivity and efficiency of the UPS. This specificity 
    is vital for maintaining cellular homeostasis, regulating 
    the cell cycle, controlling apoptosis, responding to stress, 
    and modulating signal transduction. Dysregulation in any 
    step of the ubiquitination process can lead to diseases 
    such as cancer, neurodegenerative disorders (e.g., Parkinson’s 
    disease due to Parkin dysfunction), and immune deficiencies [23, 24].
    
    The UPS is fundamental to numerous biological 
    processes, including cell cycle regulation, 
    DNA repair, apoptosis, immune responses, and 
    adaptation to stress. By removing oxidative 
    damaged or misfolded proteins, the system 
    protects cells from proteotoxicity, which 
    is particularly critical in post-mitotic 
    cells such as neurons. However, during 
    aging, the efficiency of the UPS declines 
    due to decreased expression of proteasomal 
    subunits, reduced activity of E3 ligases, 
    and accumulation of inhibitory substrates. 
    This decline leads to the buildup of misfolded 
    and aggregated proteins, contributing to cellular 
    dysfunction and aging-related diseases, particularly 
    neurodegenerative disorders. For instance, in 
    Alzheimer’s disease, the UPS struggles to manage 
    the accumulation of amyloid-beta and tau proteins, 
    while in Parkinson’s disease; alpha-synuclein 
    aggregates overwhelm the system. Similarly, 
    Huntington’s disease features polyglutamine 
    expansions that resist proteasomal degradation, 
    exacerbating the proteostasis imbalance [25, 26].
    
    Research has also highlighted the 
    interplay between the UPS and other 
    proteolytic pathways, such as the 
    autophagy-lysosome system, in managing 
    cellular protein turnover. Together, 
    these systems form a dynamic network to 
    maintain proteostasis. However, with aging, 
    this synergy is impaired, further exacerbating 
    proteotoxic stress. Efforts to counteract this 
    age-associated decline have inspired therapeutic 
    approaches targeting the UPS. For example, small 
    molecules that activate the proteasome or enhance 
    the activity of E3 ligases show promise in clearing 
    pathological proteins and restoring proteostasis [27]. 
    Additionally, compounds that enhance the cross-talk between 
    UPS and autophagy could provide dual benefits in 
    promoting protein clearance. While proteasome inhibitors 
    like bortezomib are effective in cancer therapies 
    by inducing stress in rapidly dividing cells, their 
    application in aging is limited due to the potential 
    for exacerbating proteotoxic stress. Emerging research 
    emphasizes the importance of understanding the molecular 
    and structural intricacies of the UPS for developing 
    precision therapies. Future strategies could include 
    personalized approaches that target specific components 
    of the UPS to enhance its activity in aging tissues or 
    mitigate its dysfunction in disease states. The UPS 
    remains a critical area of study for interventions 
    aimed at extending health span and combating age-related pathologies [28, 29].  
  
Autophagy-lysosome pathway (ALP)
    The ALP is a fundamental cellular 
    process that maintains homeostasis 
    by degrading and recycling damaged 
    proteins, dysfunctional organelles, 
    and other cellular debris. This pathway 
    operates by forming double-membraned 
    vesicles, known as auto phagosomes, 
    which engulf the targeted materials. 
    Auto phagosomes subsequently fuse with 
    lysosomes, specialized organelles containing 
    hydrolytic enzymes, to form autolysosomes. 
    Inside these autolysosomes, the contents 
    are degraded into basic building blocks 
    like amino acids and lipids, which are 
    then recycled to support cellular functions 
    and energy metabolism. This pathway is 
    essential for maintaining proteostasis, 
    adapting to stress, and regulating metabolism [30-32]. 
    Autophagy is categorized into three types: 
    macroautophagy, which targets large aggregates 
    and organelles; microautophagy, where lysosomes 
    directly engulf cytoplasmic material; and 
    chaperone-mediated autophagy (CMA), a selective 
    process where specific proteins are delivered to 
    lysosomes by chaperones like Hsc70 and processed 
    via LAMP-2A receptors. The ALP is tightly regulated 
    by pathways such as mTOR, which inhibits autophagy 
    under nutrient-rich conditions, and AMPK, which 
    activates it under energy stress. Beclin-1 is a 
    critical initiator of autophagosome formation [33]. 
    
    Autophagy is a critical cellular process 
    that relies on various proteolytic enzymes 
    to maintain cellular homeostasis and function. 
    These enzymes play essential roles in degrading 
    damaged proteins and organelles, thereby supporting 
    proteostasis and cellular health. As individuals age, 
    the activity of these proteolytic enzyme declines, 
    contributing to the accumulation of damaged proteins 
    and dysfunctional cellular components. This decline 
    in proteolytic activity is a key factor in the aging 
    process and is linked to various age-related diseases. 
    Table 2 provides examples of proteolytic enzymes involved 
    in aging, along with their specific roles in maintaining 
    cellular function. Autophagy efficiency declines with age, 
    contributing to the accumulation of protein aggregates and 
    damaged organelles. This decline exacerbates cellular 
    dysfunction and is linked to age-related diseases. For 
    example, in neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer’s, 
    Parkinson’s, and Huntington’s, impaired autophagy leads 
    to the accumulation of toxic protein aggregates. 
    In metabolic disorders, autophagy dysfunction affects 
    insulin signaling and lipid metabolism, aggravating 
    conditions like diabetes and obesity. Interestingly, 
    in cancer, autophagy has a dual role: it can suppress 
    tumor initiation by clearing damaged components but may 
    promote survival in established tumors under metabolic 
    stress [34, 35]. Enhancing autophagy offers promising 
    therapeutic potential. Pharmacological agents like 
    rapamycin, which inhibits mTOR, and metformin, an AMPK 
    activator, have shown efficacy in boosting autophagy and 
    improving lifespan in preclinical models. Additionally, 
    CMA enhancement by increasing LAMP-2A expression holds 
    potential for selective degradation of toxic proteins. 
    However, balancing autophagy is crucial to avoid excessive 
    activation, which can lead to autophagic cell death. 
    Continued research into autophagy modulation is key 
    for developing therapies to combat aging-related diseases 
    and improve health span [36-38].
  
Table 2.
              Examples of proteolytic enzymes involved in aging, along with their roles.
| Proteolytic enzyme | Function | Role in aging | References | 
|---|---|---|---|
| Lon protease | Mitochondrial protease that degrades misfolded mitochondrial proteins | Decline in Lon protease activity with age contributes to mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress, impacting cellular health | [39] | 
| Proteasome | Multimeric enzyme complex that degrades damaged or unneeded proteins tagged by ubiquitin | Age-related decline in proteasomal activity leads to the accumulation of damaged proteins, contributing to age-related diseases like neurodegeneration | [40] | 
| Aspartic proteases (e.g., Cathepsin D) | Acidic proteases involved in protein degradation within lysosomes | Reduced cathepsin D activity in aging affects protein turnover and contributes to the build-up of damaged proteins in neurons, contributing to neurodegenerative diseases | [41] | 
| Metalloproteinases (e.g., MMP-9) | Enzyme responsible for breaking down extracellular matrix proteins | Overexpression of MMP-9 in aging promotes tissue degradation and has been implicated in diseases such as Alzheimer’s and cardiovascular aging | [42] | 
| Deubiquitinases (e.g., USP14) | Proteases that remove ubiquitin from proteins, regulating protein degradation via the proteasome | Dysregulation of deubiquitinases like USP14 in aging can lead to the accumulation of damaged proteins and cellular dysfunction | [43] | 
| Caspases | Cysteine-dependent proteases involved in apoptosis and cell death | Age-related activation of caspases contributes to neuronal loss and tissue degeneration seen in neurodegenerative diseases and other aging-associated pathologies | [44] | 
| ClpXP protease | ATP-dependent protease that degrades abnormal proteins in bacteria and mitochondria | Decline in mitochondrial ClpXP activity during aging impairs protein quality control in mitochondria, contributing to mitochondrial dysfunction and cellular aging | [45] | 
Regulatory mechanisms of proteostasis
Transcription factors: HSF-1, NRF2, and others
    HSF-1 (Heat Shock Factor 1) is 
    a key transcription factor in 
    the heat shock response (HSR), 
    which is activated when cells 
    experience proteotoxic stress, 
    such as heat shock, oxidative damage, 
    or heavy metal exposure. Under normal 
    conditions, HSF-1 is kept inactive in 
    the cytoplasm. When stress occurs, 
    HSF-1 undergoes trimerization, a process 
    that leads to its activation and translocation 
    to the nucleus. Once in the nucleus, HSF-1 
    binds to heat shock elements (HSEs) in the 
    promoter regions of heat shock protein (HSP) 
    genes, initiating their transcription. These 
    HSPs, such as HSP70 and HSP90, are molecular 
    chaperones that help proteins fold correctly 
    and protect against aggregation. HSF-1 activation 
    has been linked to increased lifespan in organisms 
    like C. elegans and Drosophila by enhancing cellular 
    resistance to stress and reducing protein misfolding 
    and aggregation, which are hallmarks of aging and 
    neurodegenerative diseases. Furthermore, HSF-1 plays 
    a role in regulating the expression of other stress-related 
    genes, contributing to cellular maintenance during aging. 
    Factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRF2) is a key regulator 
    of the antioxidant response, orchestrating the expression of 
    genes involved in oxidative stress defense. Under normal conditions, 
    NRF2 is kept inactive in the cytoplasm through binding to Keap1 
    (Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1). Upon oxidative stress or 
    electrophilic stress, Keap1 undergoes conformational changes that 
    release NRF2, allowing it to translocate to the nucleus. In the 
    nucleus, NRF2 binds to antioxidant response elements 
    (AREs) in the promoter regions of genes encoding antioxidant 
    enzymes (such as superoxide dismutase and glutathione S-transferase). 
    NRF2 activation is a critical response to counteract oxidative damage 
    caused by reactive oxygen species (ROS). The decline in NRF2 function 
    during aging leads to an accumulation of oxidative damage, which accelerates 
    aging and is implicated in neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson’s 
    and Alzheimer’s disease. Boosting NRF2 activity has been suggested as a 
    therapeutic strategy to mitigate oxidative stress-related damage and enhance 
    longevity [46-49]. 
    
    Other transcrcontribute to stress responses and 
    proteostasis regulation. For example, ATF4 (activating 
    transcription factor 4) plays a central role in the unfolded 
    protein response (UPR), a cellular mechanism activated under 
    conditions of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress when misfolded 
    proteins accumulate in the ER. ATF4 promotes the expression of 
    genes that facilitate protein folding, degradation, and export, 
    helping restore cellular homeostasis during stress. Additionally, 
    FOXO transcription factors are involved in longevity regulation 
    and the cellular response to stress. FOXO factors are activated 
    by oxidative stress and promote autophagy, apoptosis, and the 
    maintenance of cellular repair processes. Their role in aging 
    is crucial, as they modulate both protein quality control and 
    stress resilience (Figure 2) [50].
  

Figure 2. Regulatory mechanisms of proteostasis.
Stress response pathways
    Stress response pathways are fundamental 
    to maintaining proteostasis, especially 
    under cellular stress conditions like 
    oxidative stress, heat shock, nutrient 
    deprivation, or the accumulation of damaged 
    proteins. These pathways are regulated by 
    transcription factors like HSF-1 and NRF2, 
    and their activation ensures cellular homeostasis. 
    Below are key stress response pathways: 
    
    Heat shock response (HSR): The heat shock 
    response, regulated by HSF-1, is one of the 
    first lines of defense against proteotoxic 
    stress, particularly when proteins begin to 
    misfolded under high temperatures or stress 
    conditions. HSF-1 activates the transcription of 
    heat shock proteins (HSPs), which act as molecular 
    chaperones to help in protein folding and prevent 
    the aggregation of misfolded proteins. In aging, 
    the efficiency of the heat shock response declines, 
    contributing to the accumulation of misfolded proteins 
    that exacerbate age-related diseases such as Alzheimer’s, 
    Huntington’s, and Parkinson’s diseases. Enhancing the heat 
    shock response by activating HSF-1 has been shown to extend 
    lifespan in model organisms and could be a therapeutic approach 
    for combating age-related diseases [46, 51, 52].
    
    Oxidative stress response: The oxidativrimarily 
    regulated by NRF2, is activated in response to increased 
    levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS). ROS are 
    byproducts of normal cellular metabolism, but their 
    accumulation due to mitochondrial dysfunction, 
    environmental stress, or aging can cause cellular 
    damage. NRF2 regulates the transcription of 
    antioxidant genes that protect cells from oxidative 
    damage. The ability to maintain NRF2 activation 
    diminishes with age, contributing to oxidative damage 
    and inflammation, which accelerates aging and the 
    development of neurodegenerative diseases. NRF2 
    activation has thus become a promising target for 
    therapies aimed at increasing cellular resistance 
    to oxidative stress and promoting healthy aging [53, 54].
    
    Unfolded protein response (UPR): The misfolded 
    or unfolded proteins accumulate in the endoplasmic 
    reticulum (ER). The UPR involves three key sensor 
    proteins: IRE1, PERK, and ATF6, which help manage 
    protein folding, quality control, and degradation. 
    While the UPR can be protective by restoring cellular 
    function and preventing damage, chronic or excessive 
    UPR activation leads to apoptosis and has been linked 
    to aging and diseases like Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s. 
    The efficiency of the UPR declines with age, contributing 
    to protein aggregation and cellular dysfunction. Enhancing 
    UPR signaling through modulation of its key components 
    could hold therapeutic potential in aging-related diseases [55, 56].
    
    Autophagy and longevity pathways: Auto degradation 
    process that helps clear damaged proteins, organelles, 
    and other cellular debris. Under stress, the autophagic 
    process is upregulated, helping to maintain cellular 
    homeostasis. The FOXO transcription factors play a 
    critical role in promoting autophagy under stress 
    conditions like oxidative damage or nutrient scarcity. 
    In aging, the efficiency of autophagy decreases, 
    leading to the accumulation of dysfunctional cellular 
    components. This decline in autophagy has been linked 
    to age-related diseases such as neurodegenerative 
    disorders, cardiovascular diseases, and cancer. 
    Strategies aimed at enhancing autophagic activity 
    have shown promise in extending lifespan and 
    mitigating the effects of aging. These transcription 
    factors and stress response pathways are central to 
    maintaining proteostasis, particularly under stress conditions [57]. 
  
Hallmarks of aging-related proteostasis dysfunction
Impaired protein folding
Proteins must fold into specific three-dimensional structures to perform their functions correctly. This folding process is highly dynamic and relies on molecular chaperones like HSP70, HSP90, and small heat shock proteins, which assist in maintaining the correct protein conformation under stressful conditions. With aging, the efficiency of these chaperones decreases, leading to an increased risk of proteins misfolding, which contributes significantly to aging-related diseases such as Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, and Huntington’s diseases. As aging progresses, the cellular machinery that governs protein folding, including molecular chaperones and the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) chaperone system, deteriorates. This deterioration impairs the cell’s ability to cope with misfolded proteins, leading to a decline in cellular function and an accumulation of proteotoxic species. These misfolded proteins can become toxic, disrupting cellular homeostasis and triggering pathways such as the unfolded protein response (UPR), which, when chronically activated, can lead to cellular apoptosis and tissue dysfunction [58, 59]. The unfolded protein response (UPR) is a critical cellular stress response triggered when the load of misfolded proteins overwhelms the protein folding machinery. In aging, the UPR becomes less effective, leading to a buildup of unfolded or misfolded proteins, which exacerbates the damage to cells and tissues. Chronic activation of the UPR is linked to various age-related diseases, including neurodegenerative disorders. The UPR and its relationship with aging highlights how impaired protein folding is a central feature of proteostasis dysfunction in aging [60, 61].
Accumulation of misfolded or aggregated proteins
The accumulation of misfolded and aggregated proteins is one of the most profound hallmarks of aging-related proteostasis dysfunction. Misfolded proteins, if not refolded correctly or degraded, tend to aggregate and form inclusion bodies, which are toxic to cells. These aggregates often resist degradation by the UPS or autophagy, which are the primary pathways responsible for the removal of damaged proteins. Over time, the accumulation of protein aggregates can overwhelm the cellular degradation systems, leading to cellular damage, inflammation, and organ dysfunction [46, 52]. A key example of this is amyloid plaques in Alzheimer’s disease, composed primarily of amyloid-β (Aβ), which are the result of the aggregation of misfolded Aβ peptides. In Parkinson’s disease, alpha-synuclein forms aggregates known as Lewy bodies. These aggregates interfere with normal cellular processes such as protein degradation and can lead to neurodegeneration and cell death. The accumulation of these protein aggregates is particularly problematic in neurons, which have limited regenerative capabilities. As cells age, their ability to clear protein aggregates diminishes, contributing to the onset of neurodegenerative diseases [62]. The role of impaired proteostasis in aging is especially evident in the context of the proteasome and autophagy, two key pathways that regulate the degradation of damaged proteins. With aging, the proteasome’s efficiency decreases, and autophagic flux slows down, both of which contribute to the accumulation of protein aggregates. This impairment is a central feature of age-related diseases such as neurodegeneration, cardiovascular disease, and even cancer. For instance, impaired protein quality control mechanisms like chaperone function and autophagy can lead to the accumulation of misfolded proteins, which is especially detrimental in neurons and muscles. The consequences of proteostasis imbalance are evident across systems such as the nervous, cardiovascular, and metabolic systems. Table 3 outlines the key systems affected by the decline in proteostasis and their associated impact on cellular functions.
Table 3.
          Systems affected by proteostasis decline.
| System affected | Effect of proteostasis decline | Mechanisms involved | Disease implications | References | 
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neurons | Accumulation of misfolded proteins (e.g., amyloid-β, tau, alpha-synuclein) leads to neurodegeneration, synaptic dysfunction, and cognitive decline. | Impaired protein folding, decreased chaperone function (HSP70, HSP90), and defective autophagy. | Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, Huntington’s disease, ALS. | [61] | 
| Muscle cells | Decline in muscle function due to impaired protein turnover and aggregation of defective proteins such as in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and sarcopenia. | Decreased chaperone activity, proteasome dysfunction, and reduced autophagic activity. | Muscle atrophy, sarcopenia, ALS. | [63] | 
| Heart | Proteostasis dysfunction impairs cardia c cells’ ability to remove misfolded proteins, leading to heart failure and cardiomyopathy. | Impaired protein quality control (UPS and autophagy), reduced mitochondrial function, and accumulation of protein aggregates. | Heart failure, cardiomyopathy, and arrhythmias. | [64] | 
| Liver | Accumulation of misfolded proteins disrupts liver cell function, leading to liver diseases such as fatty liver and fibrosis. | Decline in autophagic processes, proteasomal activity, and overall protein degradation efficiency. | Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), liver fibrosis. | [65] | 
| Kidneys | Proteostasis decline in renal cells leads to the accumulation of toxic protein aggregates and kidney dysfunction. | Impaired autophagic clearance, decreased proteasomal function, and mitochondrial stress in renal cells. | Chronic kidney disease, renal fibrosis, and glomerulosclerosis. | [66] | 
Proteostasis and age-related diseases: neurodegenerative diseases
Alzheimer’s disease (AD)
Proteostasis, the cellular process that ensures proper protein synthesis, folding, and degradation, is critical for maintaining cellular function (Figure 3). In the context of AD, disruptions in proteostasis contribute significantly to the progression of the disease. As AD is characterized by the accumulation of misfolded proteins, the breakdown of proteostasis exacerbates the buildup of these toxic aggregates, leading to neuronal dysfunction, synaptic loss, and cognitive decline. The primary misfolded proteins involved in AD are Aβ and tau, which, when not properly managed by proteostasis mechanisms, form damaging plaques and tangles in the brain [67, 68]. The process of protein folding in AD is disrupted, with amyloid-beta and tau failing to achieve proper conformations and instead aggregating into toxic oligomers, fibrils, and plaques. Amyloid-beta is generated from the amyloid precursor protein (APP) by the sequential cleavage of secretases, but in AD, this peptide accumulates due to inefficient clearance mechanisms. Similarly, tau, a protein involved in stabilizing microtubules, becomes hyperphosphorylated in AD, causing it to detach from microtubules and form neurofibrillary tangles inside neurons. These tangles disrupt essential neuronal functions such as intracellular transport and synaptic communication, contributing to cognitive impairment and neurodegeneration [69-71]. In animal models, impaired protein folding, aggregation, and degradation pathways have been shown to exacerbate the accumulation of toxic proteins such as amyloid-beta and tau, which are central to AD pathology. These animal studies have provided valuable insights into how proteostasis decline accelerates the development and progression of AD. Table 4 summarizes several animal studies that investigate the impact of proteostasis dysfunction on the progression of Alzheimer’s disease in aging.

Figure 3. Proteostasis and age-related diseases.
Table 4.
        Animal studies investigating the progression of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) due to proteostasis dysfunction in aging.
| Animal model | Proteostasis mechanism studied | Findings | References | 
|---|---|---|---|
| Transgenic mice (3xTg-AD) | Ubiquitin-Proteasome System (UPS) | Aging worsens UPS dysfunction, increasing protein aggregation and neuroinflammation, leading to cognitive decline. | [81] | 
| AβPP/PS1 transgenic mice | Autophagy | Impaired autophagy in aging promotes Aβ and tau accumulation, worsening memory. | [82] | 
| AβPP/PS1 double transgenic mice | ER Stress (UPR) | Aging increases ER stress, leading to tau phosphorylation and neuronal damage. | [83] | 
| Tau transgenic mice (rTg4510) | Chaperones (Hsp70, Hsp90) | Reduced chaperone levels in aging increase tau aggregation. | [84] | 
| APP/PS1 transgenic mice | Mitochondrial Dysfunction | Mitochondrial dysfunction accelerates cognitive decline in aged mice. | [85] | 
| Tg2576 mouse model | Autophagy and UPS | Impaired autophagy and UPS contribute to Aβ buildup and memory loss in aging. | [86] | 
| 5xFAD transgenic mice | Proteasome and Autophagy Cross-talk | Failure of both UPS and autophagy accelerates Aβ accumulation and cognitive decline. | [87] | 
| AppNL-F/NL-F mice | Chaperone-assisted protein degradation | Aging reduces chaperone activity, leading to increased Aβ aggregation. | [88] | 
| 3xTg-AD mice | Proteasome Function | Aging impairs proteasomal degradation, leading to neurotoxic protein accumulation. | [89] | 
| Tg2576 mice | ER Stress and UPR | Chronic ER stress in aging worsens Aβ pathology and cognitive decline. | [90] | 
    A critical aspect of proteostasis failure 
    in AD is the impairment of two major protein 
    degradation systems: the ubiquitin-proteasome 
    system (UPS) and autophagy. The UPS is responsible 
    for tagging misfolded proteins with ubiquitin and 
    directing them for degradation in the proteasome. 
    In AD, however, the efficiency of the UPS is reduced, 
    leading to the accumulation of damaged proteins like 
    amyloid-beta and tau. Similarly, autophagy, a process 
    that degrades damaged proteins and organelles in 
    lysosomes, is often impaired in AD, contributing to 
    the buildup of protein aggregates. The inability to 
    clear misfolded proteins accelerates neuronal damage, 
    making it a central feature in the progression of the 
    disease [72]. Molecular chaperones, such as Hsp70 and 
    Hsp90, are proteins that assist in the proper folding of 
    other proteins and prevent aggregation. However, in AD, 
    the function of these chaperones is compromised, which 
    exacerbates the accumulation of misfolded amyloid-beta and tau. 
    Chaperones play an essential role in maintaining proteostasis, 
    and when their activity is reduced, protein aggregation becomes 
    more likely, accelerating disease progression. The loss of 
    chaperone activity further compounds the problem, as it hampers 
    the cell’s ability to manage misfolded proteins, thus promoting 
    the accumulation of toxic aggregates [73-76].
    
    In addition to these disruptions, endoplasmic reticulum (ER) 
    stress plays a significant role in AD. The ER is responsible 
    for protein folding and quality control, but when overwhelmed 
    by an excess of misfolded proteins like amyloid-beta, it activates 
    the unfolded protein response (UPR). The UPR aims to restore 
    proteostasis by halting protein synthesis and increasing protein 
    degradation. However, in AD, the UPR is often prolonged, leading 
    to neuronal dysfunction and death. Chronic ER stress can activate 
    apoptotic pathways, further exacerbating synaptic loss and 
    neurodegeneration. Proteostasis failure in AD also triggers an 
    inflammatory response in the brain. The accumulation of amyloid-beta 
    and tau aggregates activates glial cells, such as microglia and 
    astrocytes, which play a role in neuroinflammation. While this 
    response is intended to clear toxic proteins, chronic inflammation 
    worsens proteostasis dysfunction by inhibiting protein degradation 
    systems and promoting further protein aggregation. This inflammatory 
    feedback loop contributes to disease progression and worsens the overall 
    neuronal environment [77, 78]. Genetic and environmental factors also 
    influence proteostasis failure in AD. Certain mutations, such as those 
    in the APP gene or presenilins (PS1, PS2), lead to an overproduction of 
    amyloid-beta or impair its clearance, further disrupting proteostasis. 
    Environmental factors like oxidative stress, metabolic dysfunction, 
    and aging can also impair proteostasis mechanisms, making neurons 
    more vulnerable to the toxic effects of misfolded proteins.
    
    Given the central role of proteostasis in AD, therapeutic 
    strategies targeting protein aggregation, folding, and 
    degradation pathways have emerged as potential treatments. 
    Enhancing the activity of the proteasome and autophagy systems 
    could help clear amyloid-beta and tau aggregates, potentially 
    slowing or halting disease progression. Additionally, immunotherapies 
    targeting amyloid-beta or tau have shown promise in reducing the 
    buildup of these toxic proteins. Another potential approach involves 
    boosting the activity of molecular chaperones to prevent the misfolding 
    and aggregation of proteins. Further research into restoring proteostasis 
    through these mechanisms offers hope for the development of disease-modifying 
    therapies for AD [79, 80].
  
Parkinson’s disease (PD)
      In PD, proteostasis is compromised, 
      leading to the accumulation of misfolded proteins, 
      particularly α-synuclein, which aggregates into toxic 
      forms known as Lewy bodies. These aggregates disrupt 
      cellular functions, including synaptic activity, 
      mitochondrial function, and axonal transport, 
      contributing to the degeneration of dopaminergic 
      neurons in the substantia nigra, the brain region 
      most affected in PD. The failure of proteostasis 
      in PD is primarily driven by dysfunction in key 
      protein degradation pasthways, including the UPS 
      and autophagy. The UPS is responsible for tagging
      misfolded or damaged proteins with ubiquitin, 
      marking them for degradation by the proteasome. 
      However, in PD, the efficiency of the UPS is often 
      impaired. This is particularly evident in cases where 
      mutations in the Parkin gene, which plays a key role 
      in protein degradation, prevent the efficient clearance 
      of damaged proteins. As a result, proteins like α-synuclein 
      accumulate in neurons, forming toxic aggregates that interfere 
      with normal cellular processes and contribute to neurodegeneration. 
      Similarly, the ALP, which is responsible for clearing larger 
      protein aggregates and damaged organelles, is also disrupted 
      in PD. Impairment of autophagy prevents the clearance of 
      α-synuclein and other misfolded proteins, accelerating the 
      buildup of toxic aggregates and promoting neuronal damage [91-95].
      
      One of the most prominent features of PD pathology 
      is the aggregation of α-synuclein, a protein that under 
      normal conditions helps regulate neurotransmitter release 
      and synaptic function. However, in PD, α-synuclein becomes 
      misfolded and aggregates into insoluble fibrils, forming 
      Lewy bodies that are toxic to neurons. Normally, cellular 
      chaperones such as Hsp70 and Hsp90 help prevent α-synuclein 
      aggregation and facilitate its degradation. In PD, the 
      activity of these chaperones is often insufficient, 
      allowing α-synuclein to misfold and aggregate. These 
      aggregates not only disrupt cellular functions but also 
      spread from neuron to neuron, propagating the disease 
      throughout the brain in a characteristic manner [96, 97]. 
      Mitochondrial dysfunction is another hallmark of PD, and 
      it is closely linked to proteostasis failure. Mitochondria 
      are responsible for generating energy and maintaining 
      cellular homeostasis, but they are also susceptible to 
      damage by misfolded proteins and oxidative stress. 
      In PD, defective mitophagy—an autophagic process that 
      specifically clears damaged mitochondria is a significant 
      contributor to the progression of the disease. Mutations 
      in genes like PINK1 and Parkin, which are involved in the 
      regulation of mitophagy, result in the accumulation of 
      dysfunctional mitochondria that increase oxidative stress 
      and exacerbate neurodegeneration [98].
    
    The impairment of proteostasis also triggers 
    inflammation within the brain, further accelerating 
    PD progression. The accumulation of misfolded α-synuclein 
    aggregates activates microglia, the immune cells of the 
    brain, which release pro-inflammatory cytokines that 
    promote neuroinflammation. This inflammatory response 
    not only worsens neuronal damage but also impairs the 
    function of proteostasis systems, creating a vicious 
    cycle that accelerates the degeneration of dopaminergic 
    neurons. Chronic inflammation further exacerbates oxidative 
    stress and disrupts cellular proteostasis, making it more 
    difficult for neurons to clear misfolded proteins and damaged 
    organelles [99-102]. Genetic mutations contribute to proteostasis 
    failure in PD, particularly in familial forms of the disease. 
    Mutations in genes such as Parkin, PINK1, and DJ-1 impair the cellular 
    machinery responsible for protein degradation, making neurons more 
    susceptible to the accumulation of misfolded proteins like α-synuclein. 
    These mutations highlight the critical role of proteostasis in PD 
    and provide insights into the molecular mechanisms driving the disease. 
    Additionally, mutations in the α-synuclein gene itself can lead to an 
    increased propensity for misfolding and aggregation, further promoting 
    the accumulation of toxic proteins [103, 104]. Animal studies have 
    demonstrated that disruptions in protein quality control mechanisms, 
    such as impaired autophagy and proteasomal degradation, contribute to 
    the accumulation of misfolded proteins like alpha-synuclein, which is 
    a hallmark of PD pathology. These studies help elucidate how the decline 
    in proteostasis over time accelerates the onset and progression of Parkinson’s Disease (Table 5).
    
Table 5.
        Animal studies investigating the progression of Parkinson’s disease (PD) due to proteostasis dysfunction in aging.
| Animal model | Proteostasis mechanism studied | Findings | Reference | 
|---|---|---|---|
| α-synuclein transgenic mice | Ubiquitin-Proteasome System (UPS) | Aging leads to the accumulation of α-synuclein aggregates due to UPS dysfunction, contributing to neurodegeneration and motor deficits in PD. | [105] | 
| MPTP-treated mice (Parkinson’s model) | Autophagy | Impaired autophagic degradation of misfolded proteins such as α-synuclein accelerates dopaminergic neurodegeneration in aging mice. | [106] | 
| Park2 knockout mice (Parkinson’s model) | Parkin and Mitophagy | Aging exacerbates mitochondrial dysfunction and impairments in Parkin-mediated mitophagy, leading to dopaminergic degeneration and motor deficits. | [107] | 
| α-synuclein transgenic mice | Chaperones (Hsp70, Hsp90) | Decreased levels of Hsp70 and Hsp90 with aging lead to the accumulation of α-synuclein aggregates, promoting neurodegeneration and motor impairments. | [108] | 
| α-synuclein transgenic mice | Proteasome Function | Aging exacerbates proteasome dysfunction, leading to the accumulation of ubiquitinated α-synuclein and dopaminergic cell death. | [109] | 
| α-synuclein transgenic mice | Autophagy and UPS | Both autophagy and UPS impairments in aging promote α-synuclein aggregation and neurodegeneration, contributing to PD pathogenesis. | [110] | 
| MPTP-induced mice model | Mitochondrial Dysfunction | Aging increases mitochondrial dysfunction and decreases mitophagy, exacerbating dopaminergic cell death and motor deficits in PD. | [111] | 
| Park2 mutant mice (Parkinson’s model) | Mitophagy | Defective mitophagy in aging leads to the accumulation of damaged mitochondria and dopaminergic neurodegeneration in PD models. | [112] | 
| α-synuclein transgenic mice | Exosome-mediated protein degradation | Exosome secretion and the clearance of α-synuclein are impaired in aging, contributing to the accumulation of toxic aggregates and neurodegeneration. | [113] | 
| α-synuclein transgenic mice | Chaperone-mediated autophagy (CMA) | CMA dysfunction in aging leads to α-synuclein aggregation and progressive dopaminergic neuronal death. | [114] | 
Huntington’s disease (HD)
  HD is a neurodegenerative disorder 
  caused by an expansion of the CAG 
  repeat in the HTT gene, which encodes 
  the protein huntingtin. In HD, the 
  polyglutamine (polyQ) tract within 
  huntingtin becomes abnormally long, 
  leading to the misfolding and aggregation 
  of huntingtin, which in turn disrupts 
  cellular proteostasis and contributes to 
  neuronal dysfunction and death. The 
  failure of proteostasis pathways, 
  including the UPS and autophagy, plays a 
  central role in HD progression by promoting 
  the accumulation of misfolded huntingtin and 
  other toxic proteins, thereby accelerating 
  neurodegeneration. One of the primary contributors 
  to proteostasis dysfunction in HD is the 
  accumulation of misfolded mutant huntingtin (mHTT), 
  which forms inclusions in neurons. These inclusions 
  are highly toxic and disrupt various cellular processes, 
  including vesicular trafficking, gene expression, 
  and mitochondrial function. Normally, the UPS is responsible 
  for tagging damaged or misfolded proteins with ubiquitin and 
  targeting them for degradation by the proteasome. However, 
  in HD, the UPS is overwhelmed by the accumulation of mHTT 
  aggregates, leading to impaired clearance of the toxic protein. 
  Studies have shown that the UPS is significantly impaired in HD, 
  as the presence of mHTT interferes with the function of the proteasome, 
  further exacerbating proteostasis failure and promoting the 
  accumulation of other misfolded proteins [115-117].
  
  In addition to the UPS, autophagy, a critical 
  process that clears damaged proteins and organelles, 
  is also compromised in HD. The autophagy-lysosome 
  pathway (ALP), which is responsible for the degradation 
  of large protein aggregates and dysfunctional organelles, 
  is dysfunctional in HD. The presence of mHTT disrupts the 
  normal function of autophagy, preventing the efficient 
  clearance of aggregates. Autophagic impairment in HD 
  contributes to the buildup of toxic aggregates and 
  dysfunctional mitochondria, leading to increased 
  oxidative stress, cellular damage, and neuronal 
  death. Interestingly, enhancing autophagy has 
  been shown in some models of HD to improve the 
  clearance of mHTT aggregates and ameliorate 
  some aspects of the disease, suggesting that 
  restoring autophagic function may be a therapeutic 
  strategy. Moreover, the failure of molecular chaperones, 
  such as Hsp70 and Hsp90, which help in the proper folding 
  of proteins and prevent aggregation, also contributes to 
  proteostasis dysfunction in HD. In healthy cells, these 
  chaperones assist in refolding misfolded proteins or 
  targeting them for degradation. However, in HD, the 
  chaperone system is overwhelmed by the excess of misfolded mHTT, 
  reducing the ability of the cell to cope with protein misfolding. 
  This leads to an increased burden of protein aggregation, which 
  damages cellular components and accelerates the disease process. 
  Additionally, chaperones like Hsp70 can also help in clearing 
  mHTT aggregates via autophagy, making them crucial players in
   maintaining proteostasis in HD [118-120].
  
  The mitochondrial dysfunction observed in HD 
  is another key aspect of proteostasis failure. 
  Mitochondria are essential for energy production 
  and cellular homeostasis, and their function is 
  particularly important for neurons, which are 
  highly energy-demanding. mHTT aggregates impair 
  mitochondrial function by disrupting mitochondrial 
  dynamics, including fission, fusion, and transport, 
  and by increasing mitochondrial permeability, 
  leading to energy deficits and increased oxidative 
  stress. Both the UPS and autophagy are involved in 
  the clearance of damaged mitochondria, and their 
  dysfunction contributes to mitochondrial damage in HD, 
  exacerbating neurodegeneration. Impaired mitophagy, 
  the process by which damaged mitochondria are degraded, 
  has been observed in HD, further contributing to cellular 
  dysfunction and neuronal loss [121]. Chronic inflammation, 
  often observed in neurodegenerative diseases, also plays a 
  role in proteostasis dysfunction in HD. The accumulation of 
  mHTT and other misfolded proteins activates microglia, the 
  resident immune cells of the brain, leading to the release 
  of pro-inflammatory cytokines. This neuroinflammation can 
  further impair proteostasis by affecting protein degradation 
  pathways, such as the UPS and autophagy. Inflammatory 
  cytokines can also increase oxidative stress, which in turn 
  damages cellular components, including proteins, lipids, and 
  DNA, creating a vicious cycle of proteostasis failure and 
  neurodegeneration [122, 123]. Animal studies investigating HD 
  have shown that the accumulation of misfolded huntingtin protein, 
  a hallmark of the disease, is linked to impaired protein degradation 
  and aggregation pathways. These studies provide valuable insights 
  into how the decline of proteostasis contributes to the progression 
  of HD (Table 6).
Table 6.
            Animal studies investigating the progression of Huntington’s disease (HD) due to proteostasis dysfunction in aging.
| Animal model | Proteostasis mechanism studied | Findings | Reference | 
|---|---|---|---|
| Huntington’s disease knock-in mice (HDKI) | Ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) | Aging increases the accumulation of polyglutamine aggregates due to impaired UPS function, contributing to neuronal toxicity and motor deficits in HD. | [124] | 
| R6/2 mice (HD model) | Autophagy | Autophagic dysfunction with age leads to the accumulation of Huntingtin aggregates, which contributes to neuronal degeneration and motor impairment in HD. | [125] | 
| R6/2 transgenic mice | Proteasome function | Proteasome dysfunction in aging enhances the accumulation of Huntingtin aggregates, which leads to synaptic dysfunction and neuronal death. | [126] | 
| R6/2 mice | Autophagy and the UPS | Defective autophagy and UPS function in aging contribute to the accumulation of toxic Huntingtin aggregates, leading to motor deficits and neurodegeneration. | [127] | 
| ZQ175 mice (HD model) | Mitochondrial dysfunction | Aging leads to increased mitochondrial dysfunction, and impaired mitophagy, exacerbating the accumulation of Huntingtin aggregates and neuronal loss. | [128] | 
| R6/2 transgenic mice | Protein aggregation | Aging accelerates Huntingtin protein aggregation, leading to neurodegeneration and motor dysfunction in HD models. | [129] | 
| Q175 knock-in mice | Chaperone-mediated protein degradation | Age-related decline in Hsp70 function exacerbates Huntingtin inclusion formation, promoting progressive motor deficits and neurodegeneration. | [130] | 
| HdhQ150 mice (HD model) | Autophagy and lysosomal pathways | Autophagy defects in aging lead to the accumulation of toxic Huntingtin aggregates, contributing to striatal neurodegeneration and movement disorders. | [131] | 
Metabolic disorders
Disruption of proteostasis is implicated in the progression of age-related metabolic disorders, such as type 2 diabetes (T2D), obesity, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). These disorders are often characterized by the accumulation of misfolded proteins, mitochondrial dysfunction, and altered cellular signaling pathways, all of which are exacerbated by impaired proteostasis. In age-related metabolic diseases, proteostasis failure leads to dysfunction in key organs, including the liver, pancreas, and adipose tissue, which are critical for maintaining energy balance, glucose homeostasis, and lipid metabolism. Proteostasis dysfunction has been implicated in the progression of various metabolic disorders, including obesity, type 2 diabetes, insulin resistance, and fatty liver disease, particularly as aging compromises cellular quality control mechanisms. Animal studies have shown that the decline in protein folding, degradation, and recycling systems contributes to the development and exacerbation of these metabolic conditions. For example, impaired autophagy and proteasomal function in aging models lead to the accumulation of damaged proteins and organelles, disrupting metabolic homeostasis. Table 7 summarizes key animal studies that explore the relationship between proteostasis dysfunction and the progression of metabolic disorders in aging.
Table 7.
            Animal studies investigating the progression of metabolic 
            disorders (such as obesity, type 2 diabetes, insulin 
            resistance, and fatty liver disease) due to proteostasis dysfunction in aging.
| Animal model | Proteostasis mechanism studied | Findings | Reference | 
|---|---|---|---|
| C57BL/6J mice | Ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) | Aging impairs UPS function, leading to the accumulation of misfolded proteins, insulin resistance, and adiposity. | [136] | 
| ApoE knockout mice | Autophagy | Age-related decline in autophagic activity exacerbates liver steatosis, insulin resistance, and obesity. | [137] | 
| Db/db mice (type 2 diabetes model) | Endoplasmic reticulum stress (ER Stress) | Aging-induced ER stress leads to impaired insulin signaling, promoting type 2 diabetes and obesity. | [7] | 
| C57BL/6 mice on high-fat diet | Mitochondrial dysfunction | Mitochondrial dysfunction during aging reduces energy expenditure and promotes insulin resistance and fatty liver. | [138] | 
| Ob/Ob mice (obesity model) | Chaperones (Hsp70) | Decline in Hsp70 levels with aging leads to protein aggregation, impairing glucose metabolism and promoting obesity. | [139] | 
| C57BL/6J mice | Proteostasis network (autophagy, UPS) | Impaired proteostasis network in aging leads to the accumulation of misfolded proteins in liver and adipose tissue, contributing to insulin resistance and fatty liver. | [140] | 
| C57BL/6J mice (diet-induced obesity) | Autophagy and lipid metabolism | Aging-related autophagy defects contribute to lipid accumulation and insulin resistance, particularly in adipose tissue. | [141] | 
| Zfp281 knockout mice | Chaperone-mediated protein degradation | Impaired chaperone-mediated protein degradation leads to glucose intolerance and fatty liver as mice age. | [142] | 
| Sirt1 knockout mice | Proteostasis and mitochondrial quality control | Aging-related decline in Sirt1 reduces mitophagy, leading to insulin resistance and obesity in aging mice. | [143] | 
| C57BL/6J mice (high-fat diet) | Lysosomal function and autophagy | Aging impairs lysosomal function and autophagic flux, contributing to obesity and insulin resistance in aging mice. | [144] | 
      Type 2 Diabetes (T2D): In T2D, proteostasis 
      failure is a key factor in the progression of the 
      disease. The pancreatic β-cells, which are responsible 
      for insulin secretion, are particularly vulnerable to 
      proteotoxic stress. The accumulation of misfolded or 
      aggregated proteins, particularly in the endoplasmic 
      reticulum (ER), disrupts normal cellular function and 
      induces ER stress. Under normal conditions, the ER is 
      responsible for protein folding, but under conditions 
      of metabolic stress (such as obesity and insulin 
      resistance), this process is overwhelmed. This leads 
      to the activation of the UPR, a cellular stress response 
      aimed at restoring proteostasis by enhancing protein 
      folding capacity and promoting degradation of misfolded 
      proteins. However, in the long term, persistent ER stress 
      can result in β-cell dysfunction and apoptosis, 
      contributing to impaired insulin secretion and the development of 
      insulin resistance. The UPS and autophagy also play significant 
      roles in maintaining proteostasis in T2D. In insulin-resistant 
      states, the accumulation of misfolded proteins and damaged 
      organelles (such as mitochondria) is observed, suggesting a 
      failure in both the UPS and autophagy. This accumulation of 
      damaged proteins disrupts insulin signaling and exacerbates 
      the systemic inflammation that contributes to insulin resistance. 
      Additionally, proteostasis failure in adipocytes (fat cells) can 
      affect adipose tissue function, leading to increased lipid accumulation 
      and the development of metabolic complications like dyslipidemia and 
      fatty liver [132, 133].
      
      Obesity: In obesity, proteostasis failure plays a central 
      role in adipose tissue dysfunction, which contributes to the 
      progression of metabolic disorders. In the obese state, excessive 
      fat accumulation leads to an overload of proteins and lipids in adipocytes, 
      impairing normal protein folding and triggering ER stress. Chronic ER stress 
      in adipose tissue is linked to the development of insulin resistance and 
      inflammation, both of which contribute to the progression of obesity-related 
      metabolic disorders. The disruption of proteostasis in adipocytes also affects 
      adipokine production, including leptin and adiponectin, which are crucial for 
      regulating appetite, energy expenditure, and insulin sensitivity. Dysregulation 
      of these pathways leads to a vicious cycle of obesity and metabolic dysfunction. 
      Moreover, obesity-induced inflammation activates microglia and macrophages in adipose 
      tissue, further exacerbating proteostasis failure. These immune cells release pro-inflammatory 
      cytokines, which impair cellular functions in adipocytes and other tissues. Mitochondrial 
      dysfunction in adipocytes and other tissues, exacerbated by the accumulation of misfolded 
      proteins, also contributes to the progression of obesity and metabolic disease. Impaired 
      mitochondrial function leads to increased oxidative stress and inflammation, further 
      accelerating cellular damage and metabolic dysfunction [134, 135].
      
      NAFLD: In NAFLD, proteostasis dysfunction contributes to the accumulation 
      of misfolded proteins in the liver, leading to hepatocyte stress and liver
       damage. The liver plays a central role in regulating lipid metabolism, 
       detoxification, and protein synthesis. In NAFLD, excessive lipid accumulation, 
       particularly triglycerides, leads to cellular stress and the activation of the 
       UPR in the ER. The liver’s ability to handle this stress is compromised due to 
       impaired proteostasis, resulting in hepatocyte injury, inflammation, and fibrosis. 
       Chronic ER stress in liver cells is associated with insulin resistance, steatosis 
       (fatty liver), and steatohepatitis, the progression of which can eventually lead to 
       cirrhosis and liver failure. The UPS and autophagy are crucial for the clearance of 
       damaged proteins and organelles in hepatocytes. In NAFLD, these protein degradation 
       systems are often impaired, leading to the accumulation of damaged proteins, including 
       those involved in mitochondrial dysfunction. Mitochondria are essential for energy 
       production and maintaining metabolic homeostasis in the liver, and their dysfunction 
       is a hallmark of NAFLD. Impaired mitochondrial function further exacerbates oxidative 
       stress and the development of insulin resistance. Restoration of proteostasis in hepatocytes 
       through enhancing autophagy or the UPS could help prevent or slow the progression of NAFLD [135].
    
Therapeutic approaches in targeting proteostasis for healthy aging
Targeting chaperones and folding pathways
One promising therapeutic approach to maintain proteostasis in aging involves the development of chaperone-enhancing drugs. Molecular chaperones, like HSP70 and HSP90, play a crucial role in protein folding, stability, and preventing aggregation. In aging, these chaperones become less efficient, leading to the accumulation of misfolded proteins and cellular dysfunction. By enhancing the activity of these chaperones, it may be possible to improve protein quality control and slow down the progression of age-related diseases. Small molecules such as Geranylgeranyl acetone (GGA) have been shown to activate heat shock proteins and reduce neurodegenerative symptoms in animal models, particularly in Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases [145]. Moreover, the development of small molecule inhibitors that target the molecular chaperone Hsp90 has shown promise in preclinical trials for conditions like cancer and neurodegenerative diseases, suggesting that enhancing chaperone activity could help in ameliorating the proteostasis dysfunctions associated with aging [28]. However, more clinical trials and validation in human studies are needed to confirm their efficacy and safety for long-term use in aging populations [146].
Modulating proteolytic systems
Modulating the proteolytic systems, particularly the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) and autophagy, is another approach to restore proteostasis. The UPS is responsible for degrading misfolded or damaged proteins, while autophagy helps in the removal of larger cellular debris, including damaged organelles. Both pathways deteriorate with age, contributing to the accumulation of toxic protein aggregates. Activating these pathways could clear accumulated misfolded proteins and prevent the cellular damage associated with aging and disease. Research has shown that enhancing UPS activity using small molecules like epoxomicin, a proteasome inhibitor, can improve protein degradation in aged cells, leading to enhanced protein homeostasis [147]. Similarly, boosting autophagy through compounds like rapamycin (which inhibits the mTOR pathway) has been linked to improved longevity and reduced age-related disease in model organisms [148]. These strategies, however, need to be carefully managed, as overactivation of proteolytic pathways could lead to cellular stress or undesirable effects. Clinical trials investigating autophagy enhancers and proteasome activators are underway as summarized in Table 8, but significant challenges remain in fine-tuning these pathways for therapeutic use [149].
Table 8.
        Some ongoing clinical trials related to proteolysis in aging.
| Study name | Clinical trial ID | Intervention | Phase | Focus area | Status | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lomecel-B for aging frailty | NCT03735277 | Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs) | Phase II | Aging frailty and sarcopenia | Active, recruiting | 
| Senolytic therapy for aging | NCT03814783 | Dasatinib + Quercetin | Phase I/II | Cellular senescence and aging | Active, recruiting | 
| Exosome therapy for aging frailty | NCT04162357 | Exosomes derived from MSCs | Phase I/II | Age-related frailty | Active, recruiting | 
| Targeting senescence in cardiovascular aging | NCT04531443 | Navitoclax (Bcl-2 inhibitor) | Phase I | Cardiovascular aging and endothelial dysfunction | Recruiting | 
| Proteostasis restoration in neurodegeneration | NCT04644313 | Proteostasis regulators (e.g., modafinil) | Phase I | Alzheimer’s and neurodegenerative diseases | Recruiting | 
| Impact of autophagy enhancement on aging | NCT03063689 | Rapamycin | Phase II | Autophagy in aging-related conditions | Active, not recruiting | 
Emerging therapeutics
    Several promising proteostasis regulators 
    are currently in clinical trials, aiming 
    to slow aging and treat age-related diseases 
    by restoring proteostasis. One such approach 
    involves Nrf2 activators, which can regulate 
    the expression of genes involved in oxidative 
    stress response and protein degradation. Preclinical 
    studies have shown that activating Nrf2 can enhance 
    the cellular antioxidant capacity and improve proteostasis, 
    potentially delaying age-related neurodegeneration and 
    metabolic dysfunction [150]. Another class of proteostasis 
    regulators under investigation includes Hsp70 inducers like 
    BGP-15, which has been shown to promote protein refolding 
    and prevent aggregation in neurodegenerative diseases [151]. 
    These compounds are undergoing early-phase clinical trials, 
    and while the results are promising, the long-term safety and 
    effectiveness of these therapies require further exploration. 
    A significant challenge in this area remains developing drugs 
    that can specifically target proteostasis pathways without 
    causing off-target effects, particularly when using systemic 
    activators that affect multiple tissues in the body.
    
  
Conclusions
    This review underscores the pivotal role of 
    proteostasis in maintaining cellular function, 
    particularly in aging and neurodegenerative 
    diseases. Proteostasis, the balance of protein 
    synthesis, folding, and degradation, is maintained 
    by molecular chaperones like heat shock proteins 
    (HSPs), which ensure proper protein folding, prevent 
    aggregation, and promote the degradation of misfolded 
    proteins. Chaperones, including Hsp70, Hsp90, and small 
    heat shock proteins, are crucial for maintaining protein 
    stability, especially under stress conditions such as heat 
    or oxidative stress. These proteins also guide misfolded 
    proteins to degradation pathways, such as the ubiquitin-proteasome 
    system (UPS) and autophagy, to prevent the accumulation of toxic 
    aggregates. The UPS plays a central role in maintaining proteostasis 
    by selectively degrading damaged or unnecessary proteins through a 
    regulated process involving ubiquitination and proteasomal 
    degradation. Autophagy further supports proteostasis by 
    degrading damaged proteins and organelles through lysosomal 
    pathways. However, with aging, the efficiency of both the 
    UPS and autophagy declines, leading to an accumulation of 
    misfolded or aggregated proteins. These aggregates, which 
    are resistant to degradation, disrupt cellular function 
    and contribute to neurodegenerative diseases, including 
    Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, and Huntington’s diseases.
    
    Proteostasis dysfunction is a 
    hallmark of aging, and as molecular 
    chaperones, proteolytic systems, 
    and stress response pathways become 
    less efficient over time, the cellular 
    machinery struggles to manage protein 
    quality control. This dysfunction 
    exacerbates protein misfolding and 
    aggregation, triggering cellular 
    stress responses like the UPR, which, 
    when chronically activated, leads to 
    cellular damage and dysfunction. The 
    accumulation of toxic protein aggregates 
    in neurons is particularly detrimental 
    due to their limited regenerative capacity, 
    contributing to the onset and progression 
    of neurodegenerative diseases.
  
Future research scope
    A critical gap in current proteostasis 
    research lies in understanding how cellular 
    proteostasis mechanisms differ from those 
    at the organismal level, particularly in 
    the context of aging. While cellular proteostasis 
    focuses on the maintenance of protein homeostasis 
    within individual cells, the systemic effects of 
    aging introduce additional complexities, such as 
    inter-organ communication and the accumulation of 
    damaged proteins across tissues. Future research 
    should focus on elucidating how proteostasis networks 
    function at the organismal level, exploring how aging 
    in one tissue or organ may influence proteostasis in others. 
    This will provide a more comprehensive understanding 
    of systemic aging and help identify novel therapeutic 
    targets for age-related diseases like Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s.
    
    Integrating high-throughput proteomics 
    with emerging technologies such as single-cell 
    RNA sequencing and organ-on-a-chip models holds 
    significant potential for bridging these gaps. 
    High-throughput proteomics will enable the 
    identification of age-related changes in 
    protein dynamics, while single-cell RNA 
    sequencing will offer insights into cellular 
    heterogeneity and how different cell types 
    maintain proteostasis as they age. Moreover, 
    organ-on-a-chip technologies can simulate human 
    tissue responses to proteostasis imbalances in a 
    controlled environment, advancing the development 
    of more accurate models for human aging. 
    Personalized medicine approaches, incorporating 
    genetic, environmental, and proteomic data, will 
    also be essential in tailoring interventions to 
    maintain proteostasis at the individual level, 
    offering potential for more effective therapeutic 
    strategies for aging and age-related diseases.
  
Declarations
Author contributions
Gaurav N. Kasar: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing original draft, Pooja B. Rasal: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing original draft, Chandrashekhar D. Patil: Resources, Data curation, Visualization, Formal analysis, Sunil K. Mahajan: Resources, Data curation, Visualization, Formal analysis, Aman B. Upaganlawar: Resources, Data curation, Visualization, Formal analysis.
Conflicts of interest
The authors confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest.
Availability of data and materials
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
Funding
None.
References
1. Klaips CL, Jayaraj GG, & Hartl FU. Pathways of cellular proteostasis in aging and disease. J Cell Biol, 2018, 217(1): 51-63. [Crossref]
2. Margulis B, Tsimokha A, Zubova S, & Guzhova I. Molecular chaperones and proteolytic machineries regulate protein homeostasis in aging. Cells, 2020, 9(5): 1308-1318. [Crossref]
3. Balchin D, Hayer-Hartl M, & Hartl FU. In vivo aspects of protein folding and quality control. Science, 2016, 353(6294): aac4354. [Crossref]
4. Hipp MS, Park SH, & Hartl FU. Proteostasis impairment in protein-misfolding and -aggregation diseases. Trends Cell Biol, 2014, 24(9): 506-514. [Crossref]
5. Jucker M, & Walker LC. Self-propagation of pathogenic protein aggregates in neurodegenerative diseases. Nature, 2013, 501(7465): 45-51. [Crossref]
6. Mbatha NA, Mushebenge AG-A, & Khathi A. Identification of putative causal relationships between blood-based biomarkers and prediabetes-induced senescence: a comprehensive review. Physiologia, 2024, 4(2): 149-181. [Crossref]
7. López-Otín C, Blasco MA, Partridge L, Serrano M, & Kroemer G. The hallmarks of aging. Cell, 2013, 153(6): 1194-1217. [Crossref]
8. Tang J-X, & Xiao F-H. Editorial: the regulation of proteostasis in aging. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, 2023, 11: 1221510. [Crossref]
9. Löw P. The role of ubiquitin-proteasome system in ageing. Gen Comp Endocrinol, 2011, 172(1): 39-43. [Crossref]
10. Hartl FU, & Hayer-Hartl M. Converging concepts of protein folding in vitro and in vivo. Nat Struct Mol Biol, 2009, 16(6): 574-581. [Crossref]
11. Saibil H. Chaperone machines for protein folding, unfolding and disaggregation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2013, 14(10): 630-642. [Crossref]
12. Papsdorf K, & Richter K. Protein folding, misfolding and quality control: the role of molecular chaperones. Essays Biochem, 2014, 56: 53-68. [Crossref]
13. Beard JR, Officer A, de Carvalho IA, Sadana R, Pot AM, Michel JP, et al. The world report on ageing and health: a policy framework for healthy ageing. Lancet, 2016, 387(10033): 2145-2154. [Crossref]
14. Hipp MS, Park SH, & Hartl FU. Proteostasis impairment in protein-misfolding and -aggregation diseases. Trends Cell Biol, 2014, 24(9): 506-514. [Crossref]
15. Broz P, & Dixit VM. Inflammasomes: mechanism of assembly, regulation and signalling. Nat Rev Immunol, 2016, 16(7): 407-420. [Crossref]
16. Díaz-Villanueva JF, Díaz-Molina R, & García-González V. Protein folding and mechanisms of proteostasis. Int J Mol Sci , 2015, 16(8): 17193-17230. [Crossref]
17. Kampinga HH, & Craig EA. The HSP70 chaperone machinery: J proteins as drivers of functional specificity. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2010, 11(8): 579-592. [Crossref]
18. Zhang WH, Koyuncu S, & Vilchez D. Insights into the links between proteostasis and aging from C. elegans. Front Aging, 2022, 3: 854157. [Crossref]
19. Wang X, Liu X., Song K., & Du L. An insight into the roles of ubiquitin-specific proteases in plants: development and growth, morphogenesis, and stress response. Front Plant Sci , 2024, 15: 1396634. [Crossref]
20. Komander D, & Rape M. The ubiquitin code. Annu Rev Biochem, 2012, 81: 203-229. [Crossref]
21. Zheng N, & Shabek N. Ubiquitin ligases: structure, function, and regulation. Annu Rev Biochem, 2017, 86: 129-157. [Crossref]
22. Heard DS, Tuttle CSL, Lautenschlager NT, & Maier AB. Repurposing proteostasis-modifying drugs to prevent or treat age-related dementia: a systematic review. Front Physiol, 2018, 9: 1520-1530. [Crossref]
23. Vilchez D, Saez I, & Dillin A. The role of protein clearance mechanisms in organismal ageing and age-related diseases. Nat Commun, 2014, 5: 5659-5661. [Crossref]
24. Glickman MH, & Ciechanover A. The ubiquitin-proteasome proteolytic pathway: destruction for the sake of construction. Physiol Rev, 2002, 82(2): 373-428. [Crossref]
25. Berner N, Reutter KR, & Wolf DH. Protein quality control of the endoplasmic reticulum and ubiquitin-proteasome-triggered degradation of aberrant proteins: yeast pioneers the Path. Annu Rev Biochem, 2018, 87: 751-782. [Crossref]
26. Chen D, & Dou QP. The ubiquitin-proteasome system as a prospective molecular target for cancer treatment and prevention. Curr Protein Pept Sci, 2010, 11(6): 459-470. [Crossref]
27. Saez I, & Vilchez D. The mechanistic links between proteasome activity, aging and age-related diseases. Curr Genomics, 2014, 15(1): 38-51. [Crossref]
28. Kaushik S, & Cuervo AM. Proteostasis and aging. Nat Med, 2015, 21(12): 1406-1415. [Crossref]
29. Rubinsztein DC, Mariño G, & Kroemer G. Autophagy and aging. Cell, 2011, 146(5): 682-695. [Crossref]
30. López-Otín C, Galluzzi L, Freije JMP, Madeo F, & Kroemer G. Metabolic control of longevity. Cell, 2016, 166(4): 802-821. [Crossref]
31. Labbadia J, & Morimoto RI. Repression of the heat shock response is a programmed event at the onset of reproduction. Mol Cell, 2015, 59(4): 639-650. [Crossref]
32. Cuervo AM, & Dice JF. When lysosomes get old. Exp Gerontol, 2000, 35(2): 119-131. [Crossref]
33. Sala AJ, & Morimoto RI. Protecting the future: balancing proteostasis for reproduction. Trends Cell Biol, 2022, 32(3): 202-215. [Crossref]
34. Parzych KR, & Klionsky DJ. An overview of autophagy: morphology, mechanism, and regulation. Antioxid Redox Signal, 2014, 20(3): 460-473. [Crossref]
35. Yang Z, & Klionsky DJ. Eaten alive: a history of macroautophagy. Nat Cell Biol, 2010, 12(9): 814-822. [Crossref]
36. Quirós PM, Langer T, & López-Otín C. New roles for mitochondrial proteases in health, ageing and disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2015, 16(6): 345-359. [Crossref]
37. Vilchez D, Simic MS, & Dillin A. Proteostasis and aging of stem cells. Trends Cell Biol, 2014, 24(3): 161-170. [Crossref]
38. Stoka V, Turk V, & Turk B. Lysosomal cathepsins and their regulation in aging and neurodegeneration. Ageing Res Rev, 2016, 32: 22-37. [Crossref]
39. Freitas-Rodríguez S, Folgueras AR, & López-Otín C. The role of matrix metalloproteinases in aging: Tissue remodeling and beyond. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res, 2017, 1864(11 Pt A): 2015-2025. [Crossref]
40. Bello AI, Goswami R, Brown SL, Costanzo K, Shores T, Allan S, et al. Deubiquitinases in Neurodegeneration. Cells, 2022, 11(3): 556-566. [Crossref]
41. Taylor J, & Ikeda M. Role of caspases in neuronal damage. Drug News Perspect, 2000, 13(1): 5-11.
42. Feng Y, Nouri K, & Schimmer AD. Mitochondrial ATP-dependent proteases-biological function and potential anti-cancer targets. Cancers, 2021, 13(9): 2020-2031. [Crossref]
43. Brancolini C, & Iuliano L. Proteotoxic stress and cell death in cancer cells. Cancer, 2020, 12(9): 2385-2395. [Crossref]
44. Boas SM, Joyce KL, & Cowell RM. The NRF2-dependent transcriptional regulation of antioxidant defense pathways: relevance for cell type-specific vulnerability to neurodegeneration and therapeutic intervention. Antioxidants, 2021, 11(1): 8-18. [Crossref]
45. Lee JM, & Johnson JA. An important role of Nrf2-ARE pathway in the cellular defense mechanism. J Biochem Mol Biol, 2004, 37(2): 139-143. [Crossref]
46. Scheper W, & Hoozemans JJ. The unfolded protein response in neurodegenerative diseases: a neuropathological perspective. Acta Neuropathol, 2015, 130(3): 315-331. [Crossref]
47. Webb AE, & Brunet A. FOXO transcription factors: key regulators of cellular quality control. Trends Biochem Sci, 2014, 39(4): 159-169. [Crossref]
48. Morimoto RI. Cell-nonautonomous regulation of proteostasis in aging and disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol, 2020, 12(4): a034074. [Crossref]
49. Labbadia J, & Morimoto RI. The biology of proteostasis in aging and disease. Annu Rev Biochem, 2015, 84: 435-464. [Crossref]
50. Ma Q. Role of Nrf2 in oxidative stress and toxicity. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol, 2013, 53: 401-426. [Crossref]
51. Lu MC, Ji JA, Jiang ZY, & You QD. The Keap1-Nrf2-ARE pathway as a potential preventive and therapeutic target: an update. Med Res Rev, 2016, 36(5): 924-963. [Crossref]
52. Ghemrawi R, & Khair M. Endoplasmic reticulum stress and unfolded protein response in neurodegenerative diseases. Int J Mol Sci, 2020, 21(17): 6127-6137. [Crossref]
53. Calderwood SK, Murshid A, & Prince T. The shock of aging: molecular chaperones and the heat shock response in longevity and aging--a mini-review. Gerontology, 2009, 55(5): 550-558. [Crossref]
54. Du S, & Zheng H. Role of FoxO transcription factors in aging and age-related metabolic and neurodegenerative diseases. Cell Biosci, 2021, 11(1): 188-198. [Crossref]
55. Francisco S, Martinho V, Ferreira M, Reis A, Moura G, Soares AR, et al. The role of microRNAs in proteostasis decline and protein aggregation during brain and skeletal muscle aging. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2022, 23(6): 3232-3243.
56. Soti C, & Csermely P. Aging and molecular chaperones. Exp Gerontol, 2003, 38(10): 1037-1040. [Crossref]
57. van Ziel AM, & Scheper W. The UPR in neurodegenerative disease: not just an inside job. Biomolecules, 2020, 10(8): 1090-1100. [Crossref]
58. Sonninen TM, Goldsteins G, Laham-Karam N, Koistinaho J, & Lehtonen Š. Proteostasis disturbances and inflammation in neurodegenerative diseases. Cells, 2020, 9(10): 2183-2193. [Crossref]
59. Watanabe Y, Taguchi K, & Tanaka M. Ubiquitin, autophagy and neurodegenerative diseases. Cells, 2020, 9(9): 2022-2032. [Crossref]
60. Momtaz S, Memariani Z, El-Senduny FF, Sanadgol N, Golab F, Katebi M, et al. Targeting ubiquitin-proteasome pathway by natural products: novel therapeutic strategy for treatment of neurodegenerative diseases. Front Physiol, 2020, 11: 361-371. [Crossref]
61. Pagan LU, Gomes MJ, Gatto M, Mota GAF, Okoshi K, & Okoshi MP. The role of oxidative stress in the aging heart. Antioxidants, 2022, 11(2): 336-346. [Crossref]
62. Guo J, Huang X, Dou L, Yan M, Shen T, Tang W, et al. Aging and aging-related diseases: from molecular mechanisms to interventions and treatments. Signal Transduct Target Ther, 2022, 7(1): 391-405. [Crossref]
63. Inagi R, Ishimoto Y, & Nangaku M. Proteostasis in endoplasmic reticulum--new mechanisms in kidney disease. Nat Rev Nephrol, 2014, 10(7): 369-378. [Crossref]
64. Hardy J, & Selkoe DJ. The amyloid hypothesis of Alzheimer’s disease: progress and problems on the road to therapeutics. Science, 2002, 297(5580): 353-356. [Crossref]
65. Marino Gammazza A, Bavisotto CC, Barone R, de Macario EC, & Macario AJ. Alzheimer’s disease and molecular chaperones: current knowledge and the future of chaperonotherapy. Curr Pharm Des, 2016, 22(26): 4040-4049. [Crossref]
66. Dantuma NP, & Bott LC. The ubiquitin-proteasome system in neurodegenerative diseases: precipitating factor, yet part of the solution. Front Mol Neurosci, 2014, 7: 70-81. [Crossref]
67. Almeida CG, Takahashi RH, & Gouras GK. Beta-amyloid accumulation impairs multivesicular body sorting by inhibiting the ubiquitin-proteasome system. J Neurosci, 2006, 26(16): 4277-4288. [Crossref]
68. Bourdenx M, Gavathiotis E, & Cuervo AM. Chaperone-mediated autophagy: a gatekeeper of neuronal proteostasis. Autophagy, 2021, 17(8): 2040-2042. [Crossref]
69. Moreira PI, Zhu X, Wang X, Lee HG, Nunomura A, Petersen RB, et al. Mitochondria: a therapeutic target in neurodegeneration. Biochim Biophys Acta, 2010, 1802(1): 212-220. [Crossref]
70. Rawat P, Sehar U, Bisht J, Selman A, Culberson J, & Reddy PH. Phosphorylated tau in Alzheimer’s disease and other tauopathies. Int J Mol Sci, 2022, 23(21): 12841. [Crossref]
71. Yerbury JJ, Ooi L, Dillin A, Saunders DN, Hatters DM, Beart PM, et al. Walking the tightrope: proteostasis and neurodegenerative disease. J Neurochem, 2016, 137(4): 489-505. [Crossref]
72. Ciechanover A, & Kwon YT. Degradation of misfolded proteins in neurodegenerative diseases: therapeutic targets and strategies. Exp Mol Med, 2015, 47(3): e147. [Crossref]
73. Brehme M, Voisine C, Rolland T, Wachi S, Soper JH, Zhu Y, et al. A chaperome subnetwork safeguards proteostasis in aging and neurodegenerative disease. Cell Rep, 2014, 9(3): 1135-1150. [Crossref]
74. Götz J, & Ittner LM. Animal models of Alzheimer’s disease and frontotemporal dementia. Nat Rev Neurosci, 2008, 9(7): 532-544. [Crossref]
75. Zhang Z, Yang X, Song YQ, & Tu J. Autophagy in Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis: Therapeutic potential and future perspectives. Ageing Res Rev, 2021, 72: 101464. [Crossref]
76. El Ayadi A, Stieren ES, Barral JM, & Boehning D. Ubiquilin-1 regulates amyloid precursor protein maturation and degradation by stimulating K63-linked polyubiquitination of lysine 688. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2012, 109(33): 13416-13421. [Crossref]
77. Penke B, Szűcs M, & Bogár F. New pathways identify novel drug targets for the prevention and treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Mol Sci, 2023, 24(6): 5383-5393. [Crossref]
78. Li YY, Qin ZH, & Sheng R. The multiple roles of autophagy in neural function and diseases. Neurosci Bull, 2024, 40(3): 363-382. [Crossref]
79. Martinez-Lopez N, Athonvarangkul D, & Singh R. Autophagy and aging. Adv Exp Med Biol, 2015, 847: 73-87. [Crossref]
80. Nikoletopoulou V, Papandreou ME, & Tavernarakis N. Autophagy in the physiology and pathology of the central nervous system. Cell Death Differ, 2015, 22(3): 398-407. [Crossref]
81. Deng Z, Dong Y, Zhou X, Lu JH, & Yue Z. Pharmacological modulation of autophagy for Alzheimer’s disease therapy: opportunities and obstacles. Acta Pharm Sin B, 2022, 12(4): 1688-1706. [Crossref]
82. Ondaro J, Hernandez-Eguiazu H, Garciandia-Arcelus M, Loera-Valencia R, Rodriguez-Gómez L, Jiménez-Zúñiga A, et al. Defects of nutrient signaling and autophagy in neurodegeneration. Front Cell Dev Biol, 2022, 10: 836196. [Crossref]
83. Zhang K, Zhu S, Li J, Jiang T, Feng L, Pei J, et al. Targeting autophagy using small-molecule compounds to improve potential therapy of Parkinson’s disease. Acta Pharm Sin B, 2021, 11(10): 3015-3034. [Crossref]
84. Di Meco A, Curtis ME, Lauretti E, & Praticò D. Autophagy dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease: mechanistic insights and new therapeutic opportunities. Biol Psychiatry, 2020, 87(9): 797-807. [Crossref]
85. Ratan Y, Rajput A, Maleysm S, Pareek A, Jain V, Pareek A, et al. An insight into cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s disease. Biomedicines, 2023, 11(5): 1398-1401. [Crossref]
86. Sin O, & Nollen EA. Regulation of protein homeostasis in neurodegenerative diseases: the role of coding and non-coding genes. Cell Mol Life Sci, 2015, 72(21): 4027-4047. [Crossref]
87. Kwon S, Iba M, Kim C, & Masliah E. Immunotherapies for aging-related neurodegenerative diseases-emerging perspectives and new targets. Neurotherapeutics, 2020, 17(3): 935-954. [Crossref]
88. Moya-Alvarado G, Gershoni-Emek N, Perlson E, & Bronfman FC. Neurodegeneration and Alzheimer’s disease (AD). What can proteomics tell us about the Alzheimer’s brain? Mol Cell Proteomics, 2016, 15(2): 409-425. [Crossref]
89. Nedelsky NB, Todd PK, & Taylor JP. Autophagy and the ubiquitin-proteasome system: collaborators in neuroprotection. Biochim Biophys Acta, 2008, 1782(12): 691-699. [Crossref]
90. Eshraghi M, Adlimoghaddam A, Mahmoodzadeh A, Sharifzad F, Yasavoli-Sharahi H, Lorzadeh S, et al. Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis: role of autophagy and mitophagy focusing in microglia. Int J Mol Sci, 2021, 22(7): 3330-3340. [Crossref]
91. Andronie-Cioara FL, Ardelean AI, Nistor-Cseppento CD, Jurcau A, Jurcau MC, Pascalau N, et al. Molecular mechanisms of neuroinflammation in aging and Alzheimer’s disease progression. Int J Mol Sci, 2023, 24(3): 1869-1879. [Crossref]
92. Zhao Y, Lin M, Zhai F, Chen J, & Jin X. Exploring the role of ubiquitin-proteasome system in the pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease. Pharmaceuticals, 2024, 17(6): 782-792. [Crossref]
93. Radanović T, & Ernst R. The unfolded protein response as a guardian of the secretory pathway. Cells, 2021, 10(11): 2965-2975. [Crossref]
94. Kurtishi A, Rosen B, Patil KS, Alves GW, & Møller SG. Cellular proteostasis in neurodegeneration. Mol Neurobiol, 2019, 56(5): 3676-3689. [Crossref]
95. Lane CA, Hardy J, & Schott JM. Alzheimer’s disease. Eur J Neurol, 2018, 25(1): 59-70. [Crossref]
96. Bobori C, Theocharopoulou G, & Vlamos P. Molecular chaperones in neurodegenerative diseases: a short review. Adv Exp Med Biol, 2017, 987: 219-231. [Crossref]
97. Ashraf GM, Greig NH, Khan TA, Hassan I, Tabrez S, Shakil S, et al. Protein misfolding and aggregation in Alzheimer’s disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets, 2014, 13(7): 1280-1293. [Crossref]
98. Bonam SR, Tranchant C, & Muller S. Autophagy-lysosomal pathway as potential therapeutic target in Parkinson’s disease. Cells, 2021, 10(12): 3547-3557. [Crossref]
99. Day JO, & Mullin S. The genetics of Parkinson’s disease and implications for clinical practice. Genes, 2021, 12(7): 1006-1016. [Crossref]
100. Elsasser S, & Finley D. Delivery of ubiquitinated substrates to protein-unfolding machines. Nat Cell Biol, 2005, 7(8): 742-749. [Crossref]
101. Lotharius J, & Brundin P. Pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease: dopamine, vesicles and alpha-synuclein. Nat Rev Neurosci, 2002, 3(12): 932-942. [Crossref]
102. Dehay B, Bourdenx M, Gorry P, Przedborski S, Vila M, Hunot S, et al. Targeting α-synuclein for treatment of Parkinson’s disease: mechanistic and therapeutic considerations. Lancet Neurol, 2015, 14(8): 855-866. [Crossref]
103. Lim KL. Ubiquitin-proteasome system dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease: current evidence and controversies. Expert Rev Proteomics, 2007, 4(6): 769-781. [Crossref]
104. Alvarez-Erviti L, Rodriguez-Oroz MC, Cooper JM, Caballero C, Ferrer I, Obeso JA, et al. Chaperone-mediated autophagy markers in Parkinson disease brains. Arch Neurol, 2010, 67(12): 1464-1472. [Crossref]
105. Berthet A, Bezard E, Porras G, Fasano S, Barroso-Chinea P, Dehay B, et al. L-DOPA impairs proteasome activity in parkinsonism through D1 dopamine receptor. J Neurosci, 2012, 32(2): 681-691. [Crossref]
106. Blandini F, Sinforiani E, Pacchetti C, Samuele A, Bazzini E, Zangaglia R, et al. Peripheral proteasome and caspase activity in Parkinson disease and Alzheimer disease. Neurology, 2006, 66(4): 529-534. [Crossref]
107. Banerjee R, Beal MF, & Thomas B. Autophagy in neurodegenerative disorders: pathogenic roles and therapeutic implications. Trends Neurosci, 2010, 33(12): 541-549. [Crossref]
108. Malpartida AB, Williamson M, Narendra DP, Wade-Martins R, & Ryan BJ. Mitochondrial dysfunction and mitophagy in Parkinson’s disease: from mechanism to therapy. Trends Biochem Sci, 2021, 46(4): 329-343. [Crossref]
109. Jin SM, & Youle RJ. PINK1- and Parkin-mediated mitophagy at a glance. J Cell Sci, 2012, 125(Pt 4): 795-799. [Crossref]
110. Stefanis L. α-Synuclein in Parkinson’s disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med, 2012, 2(2): a009399. [Crossref]
111. Lee J, Sung KW, Bae EJ, Yoon D, Kim D, Lee JS, et al. 111 Targeted degradation of ⍺-synuclein aggregates in Parkinson’s disease using the AUTOTAC technology. Mol Neurodegener, 2023, 18(1): 41-51. [Crossref]
112. Tong H, Yang T, Xu S, Li X, Liu L, Zhou G, et al. Huntington’s disease: complex pathogenesis and therapeutic strategies. Int J Mol Sci, 2024, 25(7): 3845-3855. [Crossref]
113. Estevez-Fraga C, Flower MD, & Tabrizi SJ. Therapeutic strategies for Huntington’s disease. Curr Opin Neurol, 2020, 33(4): 508-518. [Crossref]
114. Ortega Z, & Lucas JJ. Ubiquitin-proteasome system involvement in Huntington’s disease. Front Mol Neurosci, 2014, 7: 77-87. [Crossref]
115. Ciechanover A, & Kwon YT. Protein quality control by molecular chaperones in neurodegeneration. Front Neurosci, 2017, 11: 185-195. [Crossref]
116. Sarkar S, & Rubinsztein DC. Huntington’s disease: degradation of mutant huntingtin by autophagy. Febs J, 2008, 275(17): 4263-4270. [Crossref]
117. Qi L, Zhang XD, Wu JC, Lin F, Wang J, DiFiglia M, et al. The role of chaperone-mediated autophagy in huntingtin degradation. PLoS One, 2012, 7(10): e46834. [Crossref]
118. Li XJ, & Li S. Proteasomal dysfunction in aging and Huntington disease. Neurobiol Dis, 2011, 43(1): 4-8. [Crossref]
119. Sweeney P, Park H, Baumann M, Dunlop J, Frydman J, Kopito R, et al. Protein misfolding in neurodegenerative diseases: implications and strategies. Transl Neurodegener, 2017, 6: 6-16. [Crossref]
120. Ross CA, & Poirier MA. Protein aggregation and neurodegenerative disease. Nat Med, 2004, 10 Suppl: S10-17. [Crossref]
121. Bence NF, Sampat RM, & Kopito RR. Impairment of the ubiquitin-proteasome system by protein aggregation. Science, 2001, 292(5521): 1552-1555. [Crossref]
122. Ciechanover A, & Brundin P. The ubiquitin proteasome system in neurodegenerative diseases: sometimes the chicken, sometimes the egg. Neuron, 2003, 40(2): 427-446. [Crossref]
123. Bett JS, Goellner GM, Woodman B, Pratt G, Rechsteiner M, & Bates GP. Proteasome impairment does not contribute to pathogenesis in R6/2 Huntington’s disease mice: exclusion of proteasome activator REGgamma as a therapeutic target. Hum Mol Genet, 2006, 15(1): 33-44. [Crossref]
124. Ravikumar B, Vacher C, Berger Z, Davies JE, Luo S, Oroz LG, et al. Inhibition of mTOR induces autophagy and reduces toxicity of polyglutamine expansions in fly and mouse models of Huntington disease. Nat Genet, 2004, 36(6): 585-595. [Crossref]
125. Cen X, Zhang M, Zhou M, Ye L, & Xia H. Mitophagy regulates neurodegenerative diseases. Cells, 2021, 10(8): 1876-1886. [Crossref]
126. Warrick JM, Chan HYE, Gray-Board GL, Chai Y, Paulson HL, & Bonini NM. Suppression of polyglutamine-mediated neurodegeneration in Drosophila by the molecular chaperone HSP70. Nature Genetics, 1999, 23(4): 425-428. [Crossref]
127. Gusella JF, MacDonald ME, Ambrose CM, & Duyao MP. Molecular genetics of Huntington’s disease. Arch Neurol, 1993, 50(11): 1157-1163. [Crossref]
128. Guo F, Liu X, Cai H, & Le W. Autophagy in neurodegenerative diseases: pathogenesis and therapy. Brain Pathol, 2018, 28(1): 3-13. [Crossref]
129. Hetz C, & Papa FR. The unfolded protein response and cell fate control. Mol Cell, 2018, 69(2): 169-181. [Crossref]
130. Kim YC, & Guan KL. mTOR: a pharmacologic target for autophagy regulation. J Clin Invest, 2015, 125(1): 25-32. [Crossref]
131. James HA, O’Neill BT, & Nair KS. Insulin regulation of proteostasis and clinical implications. Cell Metab, 2017, 26(2): 310-323. [Crossref]
132. Rocchi A, & He C. Emerging roles of autophagy in metabolism and metabolic disorders. Front Biol, 2015, 10(2): 154-164. [Crossref]
133. Sun-Wang JL, Yarritu-Gallego A, Ivanova S, & Zorzano A. The ubiquitin-proteasome system and autophagy: self-digestion for metabolic health. Trends Endocrinol Metab, 2021, 32(8): 594-608. [Crossref]
134. Karsli-Uzunbas G, Guo JY, Price S, Teng X, Laddha SV, Khor S, et al. Autophagy is required for glucose homeostasis and lung tumor maintenance. Cancer Discov, 2014, 4(8): 914-927. [Crossref]
135. Ghemrawi R, Battaglia-Hsu SF, & Arnold C. Endoplasmic reticulum stress in metabolic disorders. Cells, 2018, 7(6): 63-73. [Crossref]
136. Prasun P. Mitochondrial dysfunction in metabolic syndrome. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis, 2020, 1866(10): 165838. [Crossref]
137. Cuervo AM, & Dice JF. Age-related decline in chaperone-mediated autophagy. J Biol Chem, 2000, 275(40): 31505-31513. [Crossref]
138. Clemente-Postigo M, Tinahones A, El Bekay R, Malagón MM, & Tinahones FJ. The role of autophagy in white adipose tissue function: implications for metabolic health. Metabolites, 2020, 10(5): 179-189. [Crossref]
139. Massey AC, Zhang C, & Cuervo AM. Chaperone-mediated autophagy in aging and disease. Curr Top Dev Biol, 2006, 73: 205-235. [Crossref]
140. You Y, & Liang W. SIRT1 and SIRT6: The role in aging-related diseases. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis, 2023, 1869(7): 166815. [Crossref]
141. Guerrero-Navarro L, Jansen-Dürr P, & Cavinato M. Age-related lysosomal dysfunctions. Cells, 2022, 11(12): 1977-1987. [Crossref]
142. Uchida S, Fujiki M, Nagai Y, Abe T, & Kobayashi H. Geranylgeranylacetone, a noninvasive heat shock protein inducer, induces protein kinase C and leads to neuroprotection against cerebral infarction in rats. Neuroscience Letters, 2006, 396(3): 220-224. [Crossref]
143. Li ZN, & Luo Y. HSP90 inhibitors and cancer: prospects for use in targeted therapies (review). Oncol Rep, 2023, 49(1): 8443. [Crossref]
144. Beretta G, & Shala AL. Impact of heat shock proteins in neurodegeneration: possible therapeutical targets. Ann Neurosci, 2022, 29(1): 71-82. [Crossref]
145. Hakim V, Cohen LD, Zuchman R, Ziv T, & Ziv NE. The effects of proteasomal inhibition on synaptic proteostasis. Embo J, 2016, 35(20): 2238-2262. [Crossref]
146. Federico M, De la Fuente S, Palomeque J, & Sheu SS. The role of mitochondria in metabolic disease: a special emphasis on heart dysfunction. J Physiol, 2021, 599(14): 3477-3493. [Crossref]
147. Wang CH, & Wei YH. Roles of mitochondrial sirtuins in mitochondrial function, redox homeostasis, insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. Int J Mol Sci, 2020, 21(15): 5266-5276. [Crossref]
148. Theurey P, & Pizzo P. The aging mitochondria. Genes, 2018, 9(1): 22-32. [Crossref]
149. Loeffler DA. Influence of normal aging on brain autophagy: a complex scenario. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 2019, 11: 49-59. [Crossref]
150. Bustamante-Barrientos FA, Luque-Campos N, Araya MJ, Lara-Barba E, de Solminihac J, Pradenas C, et al. Mitochondrial dysfunction in neurodegenerative disorders: Potential therapeutic application of mitochondrial transfer to central nervous system-residing cells. J Transl Med, 2023, 21(1): 613-623. [Crossref]
151. Levine B, & Kroemer G. Autophagy in the pathogenesis of disease. Cell, 2008, 132(1): 27-42. [Crossref]