Open Access | Case Report
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Isolated tubercular orchi-epididymitis with painful hydrocoele: Case report
*Corresponding author: NEDJIM Abdelkerim Saleh
Mailing address: Department of Urology, Ibn Rochd University
Hospital and Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Casablanca,
Morocco.
Email: nedjimsaleh@gmail.com
11 October 2020 / Accepted: 11 November 2020
DOI: 10.31491/CSRC.2020.12.066
Abstract
Testicular tuberculosis is rare and represents only 3% of genitourinary tuberculosis cases. We are reporting a case of tuberculous orchi-epididymitis which was manifesting as a painful hydrocoele knowing that the condition has become favourable with a good evolution after conservative surgical intervention and anti-bacillary treatment.
Keywords
Hydrocoele; orchiepididymitis; surgery; tuberculosis
Introduction
Testicular tuberculosis is rare about genitourinary tuberculosis and represents only 3% of genitourinary tuberculosis cases [1]. Its clinical symptomatology is non-specific and the available microbiological tests are of low sensitivity. Treatment can be medical at an early stage, but the delay in diagnosis can lead to orchiectomy [2]. We are reporting a case of tuberculous orchiepididymitis that has manifested as a painful hydrocoele and the condition has become favorable with a good evolution after conservative surgical intervention and anti-bacillary treatment.
Case Report
Mr. A. A, 43 years old, a chronic smoker, with no notable past medical history, come to the emergency
department for pain with fever on scrotal swelling that
had been evolving for about one year. Clinical examination found a conscious and stable patient with a body
Case Report
temperature of 37.8 ℃ and painful right scrotal swelling extending to the inguinal region. This swelling was
transluminal (Figure 1).
The ultrasound scan (Figure 2) carried out as a matter of emergency revealed the presence of a scrotal
swelling which was poorly limited with thick and mobile echogenic content. This thick formation extends
toward the right spermatic cord which is swollen and
oedematous. It is associated with a right testicle of
normal volume, regular contours, heterogeneous echostructure with a poorly limited hypoechoic range and
hypervascularization.
Surgical exploration revealed a hydrocele with a cloudy
content and significant swelling of the cord with the
presence of fibrous tissue at the expense of the right
testicle (Figure 3). The epididymis was individualized.
Fluid sampling and biopsies were taken and a hydrocoele cure was performed. The Ziehl stain was positive,
and the cytology has isolated tuberculoid granulomas.
The postoperative follow-up was simple. Bacteriological and cytological studies supported the diagnosis of
tuberculosis. The patient was put under anti-bacillary
treatment.
Discussion
Genitourinary tuberculosis involving the epididymis
is caused by retrograde extension from the prostate and/or seminal vesicles, or by blood. The epididymal
tail is most often affected, and the involvement may be
unilateral or bilateral. Untreated epididymal infection
can progress to orchi-epididymitis. Tuberculous involvement may be manifested by the thickening of the
scrotal skin, hydrocoele, or scrotal abscess [3]. Testicular involvement is rare and represents only 3% of genitourinary tuberculosis cases [1]. We are reporting one
case of isolated tuberculous orchi-epididymitis with a
painful hydrocoele as a presentation.
In 80% of the cases, patients with tuberculous orchiepididymitis have a scrotal mass, which can be painful in 40-44%. Bilateral tuberculous involvement is
observed in 34% of cases, 4-50% may present late
with an abscess or fistula and 5-10% may have an associated hydrocoele [4]. It has been described that the
presentation appears as a painful, rapidly progressing
hydrocoele that’s due to the isolated involvement of
the albuginea and tunica vaginalis [5].
Ultrasonography is currently the best imaging technique to study the scrotum and its contents. It can be
used to reliably differentiate between intratesticular
lesions [6]. Ultrasound can reveal heterogeneous epididymitis with hypoechoic areas [7]. The ultrasound
carried out in our patient’s emergency revealed the
presence of a poorly limited scrotal swelling with a
thick and mobile echogenic content. In addition to the
aspects described in the literature, the right spermatic
cord was swollen and oedematous with the contralateral testis which is heterogeneous and has a poorly
limited hypoechoic area with hypo-vascularisation.
The diagnosis can be confirmed by culture, ZiehlNeelsen staining, and/or histological examination [8].
The cytological study allowed the diagnosis to be made by isolating a tuberculoid granuloma with a positive
Ziehl stain.
The treatment of tuberculous orchi-epididymitis is essentially conservative. The classic scheme in practice
is the combination of four molecules (rifampicin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol) for 6 months
in two phases. The cure rate is over 95% [9]. Surgery
is recommended for patients who do not respond to
medical treatment within the first 2 months or those
who present an intrascrotal abscess [10]. Our attitude
was conservative. The evolution was favorable after six
months of anti-bacillary treatment.
Conclusion
Genital tuberculosis is rare and not often mentioned in practice. In front of a painful and feverish hydrocoele, the hypothesis deserves to be evoked. The prognosis depends on the diagnosis and treatment.
Declarations
Authors’ contributions
NEDJIM and El IDRISSI contributed to all stages of the
article.
GHANNAM and ABDI contributed to the bibliographical research.
DAKIR, DEBBAGH and ABOUTAIEB corrected the article.
Conflicts of interest
All the authors stated that there is no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
References
1. Das, A., Batabyal, S., Bhattacharjee, S., & Sengupta, A.
(2016). A rare case of isolated testicular tuberculosis
and review of literature. Journal of family medicine and
primary care, 5(2), 468.
2. Yadav, S., Singh, P., Hemal, A., & Kumar, R. (2017). Genital
tuberculosis: current status of diagnosis and management. Translational Andrology and Urology, 6(2), 222.
3. Muttarak, M., Peh, W. C., Lojanapiwat, B., & Chaiwun,
B. (2001). Tuberculous epididymitis and epididymoorchitis: sonographic appearances. American Journal of
Roentgenology, 176(6), 1459-1466.
4. Suankwan, U., Larbcharoensub, N., Viseshsindh, W.,
Wiratkapun, C., & Chalermsanyakorn, P. (2012). A clinicopathologic study of tuberculous epididymo-orchitis in
Thailand. Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine
& Public Health, 43(4), 951-958.
5. Khan, S., Haroon, N., Azami, R., & Bawa, T. (2015). Isolated tuberculosis of tunica albuginea and tunica vaginalis
presenting as acute hydrocoele: a diagnostic dilemma.
Case Reports, 2015, bcr2014207744.
6. Dell’Atti, L. (2013). Ultrasound diagnosis of unusual extratesticular mass: case report and review of the literature. Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia, 85(1),
41-43.
7. Chung, J. J., Kim, M. J., Lee, T., Yoo, H. S., & Lee, J. T. (1997).
Sonographic findings in tuberculous epididymitis and
epididymo‐orchitis. Journal of clinical ultrasound, 25(7),
390-394.
8. Lenk, S., & Schroeder, J. (2001). Genitourinary tuberculosis. Current opinion in urology, 11(1), 93-96.
9. Chan, E. D., & Iseman, M. D. (2002). Current medical
treatment for tuberculosis. Bmj, 325(7375), 1282.
10. Gow, J. G., & Barbosa, S. (1984). Genitourinary tuberculosis. A study of 1117 cases over a period of 34 years. British journal of urology, 56(5), 449-455.